Grammar and Munging [was Re: Paid Sun Patches]

Tue Feb 18 16:51:50 PST 2003

On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:55:13 -0800 
Danny Howard <dannyman at toldme.com> wrote:

> Hey, Chuck, have you read
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html ?  Apparently the
> BayLISA list doesn't munge the Reply-to: headers, it is only your
> posts that set Reply-to: to the list.  You prefer to be flamed in
> public and not private? :)

Setting Reply-To is the correct/appropriate way to indicate that you
don't wish to be CC'ed on list replies.

> * opts not to "fix" his e-mail given the potentially intersting
> discussion among SysAdmins that may ensue.

Hehn.

As long as we don't get into the mail-followup-to silliness.

-- 
J C Lawrence                
---------(*)                Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. 
claw at kanga.nu               He lived as a devil, eh?		  
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/  Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.