From wingedpower at gmail.com Tue Jan 3 10:30:14 2006 From: wingedpower at gmail.com (Wing Wong) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 10:30:14 -0800 Subject: Remote power management solutions? In-Reply-To: References: <200512312249.jBVMnMib091154@prometheus.gangofone.com> Message-ID: <7097bd8c0601031030n395d5b31hef36bfcee7b2c061@mail.gmail.com> Alvin, I thought UL listing was only required if you wanted to give potential buyers assurances that your product won't spontaneously combust on them? :) Ie, for resale/sale purposes. Rich, If your USB HD are over heating, then your best bet is to get new chassis for them. My guess is that one of the following is occuring: - high speed HD in a low air flow chassis (replace with chassis with good airflow or slower hd) - hd never spins down, constantly being accessed(check the sleep/timings on the hd... replace chassis with better airflow) The remote-power-off solution works to reset your HD, but you now face data corruption and premature HD death via excessive heat and power cycling. Even if you shelled out for the remote power equipment, you'd end up shelling out for more later to replace the HD or the chassis PSU after they fail from overheating/power-cycling. Wing PS. Funny story.. I was asked to implement an automated power-cycle loop on a device to generate a response signal from a remote modem device. The interval was to power-cycle(RPC power strip used/scripted telnet session) the modem like once every 15 minutes. Worked like a charm for like 2 weeks. Then, we stopped getting the signal. Funny. Seems like the device was malfunctioning. Replaced it. Worked again. 3 days later, it failed. That's odd. Replaced it with yet another good modem. Died 5 days later. Hmm... after much ado about how they can't fail because of power-cycles and such, I changed the interval to something less intensive and the modems stopped failing... that is, until a few weeks later... Moral of the story: automated remote power cycling can be great... but can be expensive in the long run. :) On 12/31/05, Alvin Oga wrote: > > > On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Nick Christenson wrote: > > > > Has anyone seen anything like this, or built one, or have plans for > building > > > one? I don't mind cobbling something together using an OTS power > strip, but > > > I'm trying to avoid spending hundreds of dollars if possible. > > you(anybody) can "build one" > - use dtmf circuits if you want to dialin with a phone > - use embedded tcp/ip ( $25 ) microcontroller for ethernet control > - use an SCR to turn on/off the 110v devices .. but it'd > be lot cheaper/easier to use 12v control circuits to control > the (12v/5v/3.3v) atx power supply > > - problem is the required UL approvals when playing with 110v ac > > off the shelf ones run $100 - $1000 but averaging $500 or more > - less $$ for less controls and less features :-) > > c ya > alvin > > -- Wing Wong wingedpower at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bobs at tellme.com Tue Jan 3 12:04:54 2006 From: bobs at tellme.com (Bob Sutterfield) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:04:54 -0800 Subject: Remote power management solutions? Message-ID: Wing Wong wrote: > I thought UL listing was only required if you wanted > to give potential buyers assurances that your product > won't spontaneously combust on them? :) Check your homeowner's insurance. If the inspectors poring through the ashes of your house find a pile of slag that used to be unattended homebrew 110V wiring projects, that would provide them with a tempting opportunity to deny your claim. From wingedpower at gmail.com Tue Jan 3 14:52:55 2006 From: wingedpower at gmail.com (Wing Wong) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 14:52:55 -0800 Subject: Remote power management solutions? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7097bd8c0601031452x4d6bbc7fl96e2cf0b4ecc0f94@mail.gmail.com> Good to know. Thanks for the FYI. Wing. (definitely another vote for getting new chassis for those HD boxes) On 1/3/06, Bob Sutterfield wrote: > > Wing Wong wrote: > > I thought UL listing was only required if you wanted > > to give potential buyers assurances that your product > > won't spontaneously combust on them? :) > > Check your homeowner's insurance. If the inspectors poring through the > ashes of your house find a pile of slag that used to be unattended > homebrew 110V wiring projects, that would provide them with a tempting > opportunity to deny your claim. > > -- Wing Wong wingedpower at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com Tue Jan 3 20:51:40 2006 From: alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com (Alvin Oga) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:51:40 -0800 (PST) Subject: Remote power management solutions? In-Reply-To: <7097bd8c0601031030n395d5b31hef36bfcee7b2c061@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Wing Wong wrote: > I thought UL listing was only required if you wanted to give potential > buyers assurances that your product won't spontaneously combust on them? :) > Ie, for resale/sale purposes. yes.. i agree about resale/etc.. but if you have a home brew stuff plugged into the 110vac, and it caused the fire, according to the fire dept, i'm not sure what the "home owners insurance" will do .. c ya alvin From alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com Tue Jan 3 20:55:26 2006 From: alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com (Alvin Oga) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:55:26 -0800 (PST) Subject: Remote power management solutions? humm :-) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: hi ya bob On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Bob Sutterfield wrote: > Wing Wong wrote: > > I thought UL listing was only required if you wanted > > to give potential buyers assurances that your product > > won't spontaneously combust on them? :) > > Check your homeowner's insurance. If the inspectors poring through the > ashes of your house find a pile of slag that used to be unattended > homebrew 110V wiring projects, that would provide them with a tempting > opportunity to deny your claim. :-0 i swear, i didn't read your email before posting about insurance :-) and/or event he local fire dept inspectors that happen to show up and they did/do show up randomly .. - they don't like to see power strips plugged into other power strips either ... for which they do come back to verify it's been fixed c ya alvin From sigje at sigje.org Wed Jan 4 17:32:10 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:32:10 -0800 (PST) Subject: Tools of the Trade Seminar - Security Message-ID: Event: Tools of the Trade Seminar - Security Date: Feb 18, 2006 Time: 10am-5pm RSVP: (YOU MUST RSVP FOR THIS EVENT) http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23147234 Location: Yahoo Inc! 701 First Avenue Sunnyvale, CA This is the first in a series (if popular) of seminars to address specific applications, and resources that are useful to a system administrator. The day event will be tutorial style. You will learn how to use specific tools, and share tips/tricks with your peers. This event is free! You _must_ register in order to attend. We are still finalizing session topics (and are open to suggestions) but session topics may include nmap, nessus, snort, tripwire, ip filter, ethereal, netstat, tcpdump, ngrep, sleuthkit, syslog-ng, snare, sec, and/or argus. -- Jennifer Davis BayLISA Board of Directors From alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com Thu Jan 5 02:13:53 2006 From: alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com (Alvin Oga) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 02:13:53 -0800 (PST) Subject: rack-n-shelfs Message-ID: hi ya - does anybody have a favorite vendor for shelfs for 4-post racks ( 29" deep chatsworth 4-post racks, with square holes :-0 ) - i prefer custom metal, but for sanity's sake, i wanna see what other folks do locally :-) - local vendors is preferred over online webstores - they already bought 11x 4-post racks but no shelfs and no cable management yet :-) - their idea of (re)using the 2-post telco rack shelf doesn't work :-) - their idea of (re)using the dell 2-post sliding rails to be used in the 4-post racks wont work either :-) and those puppies runs say $150/$200 a set vs a $20 custom metal rack shelf :-) - moving ( corp network infrastructure ) is fun isn't it :-) - it'd be fun to move and carry 12x 50lb tripplite ups thanx alvin btw.. for those that wanted the CRTs .. i'm still waiting for the ceo's to say take away the old crts and pc ( the current get-out-of-the-office-space is set for mid jan ) From dsmith at FinancialEngines.com Thu Jan 5 07:58:50 2006 From: dsmith at FinancialEngines.com (David Smith) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 07:58:50 -0800 Subject: rack-n-shelfs Message-ID: <17D60EFECB2C044097D6C4336DD8ED75568036@INF-EXCH-SJC-01.fngn.com> I've had good luck with these guys: http://www.racksolutions.com/ ---- David Smith Voice: 650-565-7750 Fax: 650-565-4905 432F 465C 5866 FC46 5B19 EAC6 AED3 E032 F49B 62CF -----Original Message----- From: owner-baylisa at baylisa.org [mailto:owner-baylisa at baylisa.org] On Behalf Of Alvin Oga Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 2:14 AM To: baylisa at baylisa.org Subject: rack-n-shelfs hi ya - does anybody have a favorite vendor for shelfs for 4-post racks ( 29" deep chatsworth 4-post racks, with square holes :-0 ) - i prefer custom metal, but for sanity's sake, i wanna see what other folks do locally :-) - local vendors is preferred over online webstores - they already bought 11x 4-post racks but no shelfs and no cable management yet :-) - their idea of (re)using the 2-post telco rack shelf doesn't work :-) - their idea of (re)using the dell 2-post sliding rails to be used in the 4-post racks wont work either :-) and those puppies runs say $150/$200 a set vs a $20 custom metal rack shelf :-) - moving ( corp network infrastructure ) is fun isn't it :-) - it'd be fun to move and carry 12x 50lb tripplite ups thanx alvin btw.. for those that wanted the CRTs .. i'm still waiting for the ceo's to say take away the old crts and pc ( the current get-out-of-the-office-space is set for mid jan ) From windsor at warthog.com Sat Jan 7 01:44:51 2006 From: windsor at warthog.com (Rob Windsor) Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 03:44:51 -0600 Subject: rack-n-shelfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43BF8D93.9040403@warthog.com> APC Cabinets vs. CPI cabinets -- APC Cabinets had RU numbering up the rails and half-doors (available) on the back. I did not see this as an available option on the CPI cabinets when we bought them (couple of years ago). Rob++ Alvin Oga wrote: > hi ya > > - does anybody have a favorite vendor for shelfs for 4-post racks > ( 29" deep chatsworth 4-post racks, with square holes :-0 ) > > - i prefer custom metal, but for sanity's sake, > i wanna see what other folks do locally :-) > > - local vendors is preferred over online webstores > > - they already bought 11x 4-post racks but no shelfs and > no cable management yet :-) > > - their idea of (re)using the 2-post telco rack > shelf doesn't work :-) > > - their idea of (re)using the dell 2-post sliding rails > to be used in the 4-post racks wont work either :-) > and those puppies runs say $150/$200 a set vs a > $20 custom metal rack shelf :-) > > - moving ( corp network infrastructure ) is fun isn't it :-) > - it'd be fun to move and carry 12x 50lb tripplite ups > > thanx > alvin > > btw.. for those that wanted the CRTs .. i'm still waiting > for the ceo's to say take away the old crts and pc > ( the current get-out-of-the-office-space is set for mid jan ) > > > > -- Internet: windsor at warthog.com __o Life: Rob at Carrollton.Texas.USA.Earth _`\<,_ (_)/ (_) "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance." -- Major General John Sedgwick From ulf at Alameda.net Sat Jan 7 01:53:51 2006 From: ulf at Alameda.net (Ulf Zimmermann) Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 01:53:51 -0800 Subject: rack-n-shelfs In-Reply-To: <43BF8D93.9040403@warthog.com> References: <43BF8D93.9040403@warthog.com> Message-ID: <20060107095351.GD83399@evil.alameda.net> On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 03:44:51AM -0600, Rob Windsor wrote: > APC Cabinets vs. CPI cabinets -- APC Cabinets had RU numbering up the > rails and half-doors (available) on the back. > > I did not see this as an available option on the CPI cabinets when we > bought them (couple of years ago). Some of the CPIs do had it 2 years ago, we bought some relay racks and quadra frame, I think the relay racks and the roundhole quadra frame did, but I would have to check. We took the quadra frames out a while ago, replaced them with HP 10000 cabinets. The quadra server racks were not bad for open 29" deep square hole. Only wished they would have them in 8', but no. As we are basically a complete HP shop and have certain customers which look at "look", we decided to use HP cabinets when we expanded. -- Regards, Ulf. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-865-0204 You can find my resume at: http://seven.Alameda.net/~ulf/resume.html From deirdre at deirdre.net Sat Jan 7 02:01:28 2006 From: deirdre at deirdre.net (Deirdre Saoirse Moen) Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:01:28 -0800 Subject: rack-n-shelfs In-Reply-To: <20060107095351.GD83399@evil.alameda.net> References: <43BF8D93.9040403@warthog.com> <20060107095351.GD83399@evil.alameda.net> Message-ID: <0A703BC2-4CD0-41A6-ADB5-5C485B9344C0@deirdre.net> On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:53 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote: > Some of the CPIs do had it 2 years ago, we bought some relay racks and > quadra frame, I think the relay racks and the roundhole quadra > frame did, > but I would have to check. We took the quadra frames out a while ago, > replaced them with HP 10000 cabinets. I'm not much of a rack person, but the level three facility in San Diego has double relay racks, which the network admins loved once they got the right shelves. http://www.racksolutions.com/double-relay-racks.shtml -- _Deirdre http://deirdre.net From alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com Sat Jan 7 02:16:48 2006 From: alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com (Alvin Oga) Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:16:48 -0800 (PST) Subject: rack-n-shelfs In-Reply-To: <20060107095351.GD83399@evil.alameda.net> Message-ID: hi ya On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Ulf Zimmermann wrote: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 03:44:51AM -0600, Rob Windsor wrote: > > APC Cabinets vs. CPI cabinets -- APC Cabinets had RU numbering up the > > rails and half-doors (available) on the back. the 4-post quadra ( cpi ) has "1U" markins on the front and is "square holes" vs nice thread rails them tinnermann screws is about $0.80 per set for M6 ( tinnerman + screw ) and is about $0.21 for 10-32 -------- the 6' cablemanagement is about $40 ( 1Us ) vs $60 for 3Us (rough widths) the shelf ... the distributors didn't have it, so i had my little metal shops folks make a prototype 29" deep 4-post shelf .. ( 3hr job to get a prototype shelf, i'd say that is damned good ) - i'll probably get a bunch made and will have extras made - the question is to paint it neon pink or florescent green :-) i even got just the one the rear half-bracket to extend the slides to fit into the 29" deep cabinets all done locally in 24hrs with local distributors and picked up at their will call dept - anybody can order from online .. but not everybody carries it in stock that one can go pick up in person within 2-4hrs !#done - patt-patt or a swift kick in the butt :-0 to get moving on other items :-) c ya alvin - the throw away crt issue is still flipping and flopping within management decisions From sigje at sigje.org Sun Jan 8 18:47:09 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:47:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: Upcoming ACCU event - Making Data Disappear with Radia Perlman Message-ID: When: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 Topic: Making Data Disappear Speaker: Radia Perlman Time: 7:00pm Where: eBay Town Hall (next to PayPal/eBay) 2161 North First St San Jose, CA 95131 Map: Cost: Free More Info: It's difficult to ensure that data has been completely deleted, especially if it must be robustly available before it expires. To be robustly recoverable, there must be copies on backup media, stored in many different locations. It would be infeasible to ensure that all copies of a file get deleted. The basic solution is to encrypt the data, store it in encrypted form, and then throw away the key. This talk describes a system that centralizes the expense and expertise of key management, but in a way with minimal trust in the key managers, so that key management and storage can both be outsourced. This talk describes how to do time-based deletion (where the expiration time of the file is declared when the file is created), and on-demand delete (where an individual file is deleted without prior plan of deletion time). Radia Perlman is a Distinguished Engineer at Sun Microsystems. She is known for her contributions to bridging (spanning tree algorithm) and routing (link state distribution) as well as security (sabotage-proof networks). She is the author of the textbook Interconnections: Bridges and Routers, and co-author of Network Security: Private Communication in a Public World, two of the top 10 Networking reference books, according to Network Magazine. Dr. Perlman is one of the networking industry's 25 most influential people, according to Data Communications Magazine. She has about 50 issued patents in the fields of routing and security. She has a PhD in computer science, degrees in mathematics from MIT, and an honorary doctorate from the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden. From sigje at sigje.org Mon Jan 9 02:24:42 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 02:24:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: Member Services... Message-ID: Do members, potential members see value in any of the following? (please discuss) - shell account - resume posting - @baylisa.org mail account or alias - newsletter Should the member directory be public? or just browseable to members only? or a mixture of both, with members able to choose whether they are shown at all, or only to members? Thanks! Jennifer From stripes at tigerlair.com Mon Jan 9 08:10:40 2006 From: stripes at tigerlair.com (stripes) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:10:40 -0500 Subject: Member Services... In-Reply-To: ; from sigje@sigje.org on Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:24:42AM -0800 References: Message-ID: <20060109111040.A30029@tigerlair.com> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:24:42AM -0800, Jennifer Davis wrote: > Do members, potential members see value in any of the following? (please > discuss) > > - shell account Oh yeah :) > - resume posting Of course. > - @baylisa.org mail account or alias Goes good with the resume posting. > - newsletter It depends on the content you want in there. > Should the member directory be public? or just browseable to members > only? or a mixture of both, with members able to choose whether they are > shown at all, or only to members? I would not have anyone's email address public. ISC^2 (The CISSP certification group) does their directory right: They do an opt-in, and I don't think anyone has opted in. In a world of more junk snail mail and spam, I'm not for this. -Anne -- It might look like I'm doing (\`--/') _ _______ .-r-. nothing, but at the cellular >.~.\ `` ` `,`,`. ,'_'~`. level, I'm really quite busy. (v_," ; `,-\ ; : ; \/,-~) \ stripes at tigerlair dot com `--'_..),-/ ' ' '_.>-' )`.`.__.') stripes at brickbox dot com ((,((,__..'~~~~~~((,__..' `-..-'fL From sigje at sigje.org Mon Jan 9 08:29:18 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:29:18 -0800 (PST) Subject: Member Services... In-Reply-To: <20060109111040.A30029@tigerlair.com> References: <20060109111040.A30029@tigerlair.com> Message-ID: > > I would not have anyone's email address public. ISC^2 (The CISSP certification > group) does their directory right: They do an opt-in, and I don't think anyone > has opted in. Directory doesn't have to contain email addresses. Could just be names... Jennifer From jxh at jxh.com Mon Jan 9 08:52:51 2006 From: jxh at jxh.com (Jim Hickstein) Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:52:51 -0600 Subject: Member Services... In-Reply-To: References: <20060109111040.A30029@tigerlair.com> Message-ID: <43C294E3.5080000@jxh.com> > Directory doesn't have to contain email addresses. Could just be names... Our form has a checkbox for this, which we have never used, but I think we store(d) it. It was open by default, therefore opt-in, but the definition of "Directory" was never given. I get so much spam as it is, I could live with email addresses in the directory, but I'd prefer opt-in and readable only to members. From sigje at sigje.org Mon Jan 9 09:54:04 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:54:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: Upcoming BayLISA Events - January & February Message-ID: Bunch of events coming up for BayLISA. List of RSVP-able events here: http://www.mollyguard.com/org/9207001 (that should be a list of BayLISA events) January 14 10am-5pm Camp Sys Admin with Splunk Location: Diablo Grande Wine Gallery RSVP: http://www.splunk.com/index.php/camp January 19 7:30-9:45pm January BayLISA General Meeting Location: Garage 1, Building 4, 4 Infinite Loop Cupertino, CA 95014 Enterprise Grade Virtualization with Open Source Technologies, NetBSD 3.0, and FreeBSD Kernel http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23223462 Meeting sponsored by XenSource January 26 7:30-9:45pm BayLISA Special Event! Location: Building 43, Google Campus (Directions to be posted to the website soon) Google System Administration, and Open Source at 20, A new game with New players RSVP required (speeds up the badging process!) http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23334795 Meeting sponsored by Google February 16 7:30-9:45pm February BayLISA General Meeting Location: Garage 1, Building 4, 4 Infinite Loop Cupertino, CA 95014 Mirapoint, Network/Application Troubleshooting methodology with case studies and a focus on VOIP Pizza/Beer Bash after the meeting sponsored by Mirapoint (RSVP will be available soon!) Feburary 18 10am-5pm BayLISA Special Event! Location: Yahoo! campus, Sunnyvale, CA Security Tools of the Trade seminar RSVP required! http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23147234 This event is almost full. Event Sponsored by Yahoo! February 23 7:30-9:45pm BayLISA Special Event! Location: TBA Time Management - Tom Limoncelli RSVP to be posted soon. From jxh at jxh.com Mon Jan 9 15:51:52 2006 From: jxh at jxh.com (Jim Hickstein) Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:51:52 -0600 Subject: DLT/LTO carts in south bay? Message-ID: <43C2F718.6020301@jxh.com> Does anyone know of a stocking distributor (ideally a discounter) of LTO-1 cleaning carts, and while we're at it, LTO-1 and DLT-IV data carts, that's within reach of the south bay and might be open today? Anyone want to sell me a partly-used but trustworthy LTO-1 cleaning cart, cheap? This afternoon? Will pick up! +1 651 690 2977 Yes, I'm in Minnesota, but the need is in Sunnyvale. (I have ways....) From hpaul at hammann.com Tue Jan 10 10:23:06 2006 From: hpaul at hammann.com (H. Paul Hammann) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:23:06 -0800 Subject: rack-n-shelfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43C3FB8A.4010606@hammann.com> I have been very satisfied with the custom racks we've ordered from Electrorack. Paul Alvin Oga wrote: > hi ya > > - does anybody have a favorite vendor for shelfs for 4-post racks > ( 29" deep chatsworth 4-post racks, with square holes :-0 ) > > - i prefer custom metal, but for sanity's sake, > i wanna see what other folks do locally :-) > > - local vendors is preferred over online webstores > > - they already bought 11x 4-post racks but no shelfs and > no cable management yet :-) > > - their idea of (re)using the 2-post telco rack > shelf doesn't work :-) > > - their idea of (re)using the dell 2-post sliding rails > to be used in the 4-post racks wont work either :-) > and those puppies runs say $150/$200 a set vs a > $20 custom metal rack shelf :-) > > - moving ( corp network infrastructure ) is fun isn't it :-) > - it'd be fun to move and carry 12x 50lb tripplite ups > > thanx > alvin > > btw.. for those that wanted the CRTs .. i'm still waiting > for the ceo's to say take away the old crts and pc > ( the current get-out-of-the-office-space is set for mid jan ) > > > > > > From sigje at sigje.org Wed Jan 11 16:46:56 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:46:56 -0800 (PST) Subject: BayLISA General Meeting - January 19, 2006 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Join us for the first BayLISA meeting of the year! When: January 19, 2006 7:30-9:45pm Location: Garage 1, Apple Campus, 4 Infinite Loop Cupertino CA 95014 Topic: Enterprise Grade Virtualization with Open Source Technologies Sean Perry, and Brian Lavender - XenSource Topic: NetBSD 3 for System Administrators: an Overview Jeff Rizzo, NetBSD Developer RSVP NOW: http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23223462 Directions: http://maps.yahoo.com/maps_result?addr=4%20Infinite%20Loop&csz=Cupertino,+CA+9501 4&country=us For complete abstracts, view the RSVP description. The January general meeting is sponsored by XenSource. Come join us for pizza, beverages, and quality talk about virtualization, and the just released NetBSD 3.0. From sigje at sigje.org Wed Jan 11 16:45:30 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:45:30 -0800 (PST) Subject: BayLISA General Meeting - January 19, 2006 Message-ID: Join us for the first BayLISA meeting of the year! When: January 19, 2006 7:30-9:45pm Location: Garage 1, Apple Campus, 4 Infinite Loop Cupertino CA 95014 Topic: Enterprise Grade Virtualization with Open Source Technologies Sean Perry, and Brian Lavender - XenSource Topic: NetBSD 3 for System Administrators: an Overview Jeff Rizzo, NetBSD Developer RSVP NOW: http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23223462 Directions: http://maps.yahoo.com/maps_result?addr=4%20Infinite%20Loop&csz=Cupertino,+CA+95014&country=us For complete abstracts, view the RSVP description. The January general meeting is sponsored by XenSource. Come join us for pizza, beverages, and quality talk about virtualization, and the just released NetBSD 3.0. Jennifer From sigje at sigje.org Wed Jan 11 16:50:34 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:50:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: Apologies.. Message-ID: Many apologies for the duplicate message (I tend to try to announce items to BayLISA before announcing them anywhere else, and I didn't catch that I had cc-ed baylisa@ on the second set until I had sent). Jennifer From sigje at sigje.org Thu Jan 12 12:44:55 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:44:55 -0800 (PST) Subject: Enterprise Servers and Data Centers: Opportunities for Energy Savings Conference Message-ID: For those people who have to worry about power this might be of interest: http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=products.pr_esads_conf Sun Microsystems Conference Facility, Santa Clara, CA January 31, 2006, 8:30 a.m. . 5:30 p.m. Welcome Reception: January 30, 2006, 6:00 . 8:00 p.m. You're invited to participate in a working session entitled "Conference on Enterprise Servers and Data Centers: Opportunities for Energy Savings." Participants will discuss current trends in the enterprise server market and obstacles to improved data center energy efficiency, and develop action plans to overcome these obstacles. Conference Goals: To bring together national and international stakeholders to: * Highlight the growing energy demands of today's high-density enterprise servers and data center facilities, * Share ideas on management, technical strategies, and best practices for addressing energy consumption in data center facilities, and * Collaboratively draft action plans for improving data center efficiencies. Conference Chairperson Jonathan G. Koomey, Ph.D . Consulting Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Institute for the Environment and Staff Scientist with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Agendas Day 1, January 31st: Enterprise Servers and Data Centers: Opportunities for Energy Savings Sun Microsystems Conference Facility, Santa Clara, CA Industry leaders and energy efficiency experts will open this meeting by discussing trends and challenges in the marketplace. A panel of end users will next emphasize their desire for improved efficiencies in data centers. The second half of the day promises to identify roadblocks to efficiency and drive the group toward solutions with the help of poignant case studies and small group working sessions. Day 2, February 1st: Challenges in Buildings Operations and Management for Owners/Operators of Service Provider and Enterprise Datacenters and Development of the ENERGY STAR Building Benchmark for Mission Critical Facilities AMD Conference Facility, Sunnyvale, CA Stakeholders with interests in whole building energy performance are also encouraged to attend a complementary half-day meeting being held the following day, February 1, 2006, that will focus exclusively on the impact of enterprise servers and data centers on the design, operation, and management of whole buildings. From gford at idiom.com Fri Jan 13 18:28:58 2006 From: gford at idiom.com (Glen Ford) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:28:58 -0800 Subject: Anyone know of Thinkpad repair place in bay area In-Reply-To: <20051104205638.GA23854@panix.com> References: <436BBFB3.40703@idiom.com> <20051104205638.GA23854@panix.com> Message-ID: <43C861EA.6090107@idiom.com> John Clear wrote: >On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:08:19PM -0800, Glen Ford wrote: > > >>I have Thinkpad T21 with non-functioning lcd. >>Would love to get lcd fixed. >>Can anyone on this list recommend a local repair place? >> >> > >We use A&A Computers in Santa Clara for alot of IBM laptop warranty >and non-warranty work. No idea about $$$, but they are fast and >responsive. > >http://www.anacomputers.com/contactus.asp > >John > > > > > Thanks to John and Nadine for suggesting A&A. Finally got around to taking my T21 to A&A. They fixed the LCD cable and I had my T21 back in 1 day's time cost $89 for part + $75 labor, well below the cost of replacing the T21. So thank you. /glen From jimd at starshine.org Fri Jan 13 19:17:00 2006 From: jimd at starshine.org (Jim Dennis) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:17:00 -0800 Subject: DNS Abuse? Message-ID: <20060114031700.GA14718@starshine.org> All, I've been seeing a couple of oddities on my little IDSL home network in the last few days and I'm wondering if they represent some creative new form of DNS abuse. The short form is that I'll see increasing network lag and find that two hosts out on the net are sending a number of DNS requests per second asking about e.tn.co.za. This continues across both my nameserver IP addresses (which are actually currently both IP aliases to one Debian/UltraSPARC system [slaps own wrist for being a bad admin and mutters about how cobbler's children are shod]). THis goes on for hours at a time --- and seems to slowly increase in bandwidth load over time. The first of these that I noticed involved two hosts: mail.samurai.fm (apparently the mail server for some Japanese Internet radio station) server2.unitedservers.de (apparently a German virtual hosting or colo service) At first I wasn't running any tools at all (haven't been needing them at home since my last workstation re-image). So first I installed a copy of etherape; that's a GUI that shows a star graphic of where traffic is coming and going in one window (hosts are points on a ring around the edges, and traffic appears as lines crossing the middle, colors differentiate top protocols, and thickness for relative bandwidth utilization; another window shows a table of traffic types and counts, updated in real-time, like a little tachometer, and lets me sort them by various criteria). It was obvious that I was getting hammered with DNS requests and UDP fragments. (sustained loads of ~270Kbps UDP fragments, and ~170Kbps in DNS traffic on an IDSL line that's nominally only 144Kbps --- perhaps the tool's metrics are off, but my pipe was definitely full). So I shutdown my DNS server. All the UDP fragments disappeared, and the DNS dropped to around 15Kbps --- and there now appeared about 10Kbps of ICMP traffic (port unreachable, of course). So this represented the incoming DNS; but there were some port scan and other traffic (normal background radiation these days) that were preventing me from isolating the perpetrators. Also this didn't look like an effective attack (various host integrity tests on the UltraSPARC and a couple of other systems around the house were all clean, including the latest chkrootkit and rkhunter versions from Debian). Anyway, I installed snort and nstreams and started capturing some information for analysis. Then I spotted the two machines that had been there for a long time (after the alleged nameserver in Russia finished scanning me). I restarted my named and watch while the ICMP traffic immediately disappeard (as one would expect) and the DNS draffic immediately doubled. Then over the course of an hour or so it slowly climbed to ~50-60Kbps. So now I just did: iptables -A -s $BADHOST -j DROP for each of the two culprits; did traceroutes on them and sent mail to the abuse@, support@, kontakt@ (for the one that listed a contact at their website), hostmaster and postmaster@ for both domains and for their next hop transit providers (and copied my ISP's support@ as an FYI). The incoming DNS traffic persisted for a couple hours at the 15Kbps level. (Though, it was no longer costing me any return traffic --- 'cause DROP means don't even send them ICMP) :) I also spent time Googling and talking over IRC (freenode, in the #snort channel) to see if I could identify this as any sort of known attack. Basically I'd like to put a name to it and/or figure out what these bozos are up to. I also reviewed my DNS configuration (I only would recursive lookups for "friends" --- an ACL that's defined to include my netblocks and those of the various people for him we provide secondary DNS service). zone xfers are similarly locked down, of course. (I also actually did some work during this time --- now that my VPN connection was usable again). Then off to bed. Today (after my dentist's appointment --- temporary crown for the one rear molar --- the gold crown will be ready in two weeks) I noticed a new pair of culprits. I left my etherape main graphic window up on a virtual desktop of my laptop and I've been using it as a sort of screen saver. It's kinda cool and isn't costing enough performance to bother me; even on this old 500Mhz/256MB laptop Our new "guests" are: h-68-166-138-83.nycmny83.covad.net 68.166.138.83 and: c-24-60-193-83.hsd1.ma.comcast.net 24.60.193.83 This was similar to the previous pair in that it was taking up ~15Kbps of DNS traffic. I suspect the other event started like this and slowly continued until it got bad enough for me to see it. This time I immediately started a capture process with: tcpdump -n -v -v -v -w /tmp/wtf.tcpdump host $A or host $B (after having set $A and $B with =$(dig +short ...) commands) I let that run for a couple thousand packets captured in a few minutes ... and left it running while I added a couple more packet filter rules. After about five minutes or so the two disappeared. So I've stopped the capture and done a few little cuts at the data to see what's there. That's when the e.tn.co.za. name popped out at me. It's in every request from both of them. Summary: I don't have any hard conclusions. I don't know what they're doing, but I'm sure it's bad. The fact that they appear two at a time make me wonder if someone is somehow tricking my BIND9 named into being a reflector of some sort --- like two people behind firewalls using my DNS as some sort of relay? However, a statistic sample of two events and four hosts isn't compelling. I could see that someone could be somehow preloading my DNS cache with one request and then another could be testing whether my cache was warm to that request (something like what Dan Kaminsky has talked about at LISA?) If they were making various DIFFERENT requests especially for MX records I'd suspet they might be spam cannon zombies that were trying to obscure their DNS footprints in some way; but 1100 queries for e.tn.co.za doesn't sound like it'd be useful for e-mail spam. I haven't gathered more raw data from these yet and I'm near the edge of my technical expertise at this point. So I'd have to invest alot more time to delve into this further (time which I really don't have right now). So, I put the question to the community: What the heck are these? Are there any good tools (snort rules etc) to detect them and automatically respond to them? (Naturally I don't want my dynamically generated packet filter rules to accumulate and block legitimate, innocent, dynamic IP addresses indefinitely. The rules I've put in here will be there for a couple days then I'll flush them). -- Jim Dennis From michael at halligan.org Mon Jan 16 01:46:27 2006 From: michael at halligan.org (Michael T. Halligan) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:46:27 -0800 Subject: Linux Tape Device Emulation? Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Are there any good solutions for tape device emulation? Ideally, I'd like to emulate a raid 1 volume as an RMT to my mail server. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDy2t4wjCqooJyNAMRAoOfAJ9Kg0ujFnvjcPGxzzzUlbXkZGZRLgCfdTyk tGL7YWRdhB1mJgE2zbELMvY= =b+sF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com Mon Jan 16 10:28:29 2006 From: alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com (Alvin Oga) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:28:29 -0800 (PST) Subject: Linux Tape Device Emulation? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: hi ya michael On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Michael T. Halligan wrote: > Are there any good solutions for tape device emulation? Ideally, I'd > like to emulate a raid 1 volume as an RMT to my mail server. what part of "tape device emulation" are you looking for ?? "disks" can do some of the work but: - tar can talk to tapes or disks for debugging some of the "tape sw" - disks can do raid1 - eject and mt won't work on disks :-) - /dev/st* /dev/nst* is a different set of problems c ya alvin From michael at halligan.org Mon Jan 16 14:26:46 2006 From: michael at halligan.org (Michael T. Halligan) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:26:46 -0800 Subject: Linux Tape Device Emulation? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <27F1A1D5-801E-4B4D-84F2-54E194C3FE2C@halligan.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alvin, Specifically, what I'm looking for, is a method to interface a volume, or block device, as a tape, so that I can then have remote devices read/write to that volume as a RMT (remote magnetic tape) device. I have a mail system that only supports local tape, RMT or NDMP for backups... NDMP is way out of my budget right now (lowest cost software I've found that does ndmp reliably is almost as much as the mail system cost.. about $20k), and I'd rather not buy a tape drive right now, if I could avoid it. On Jan 16, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Alvin Oga wrote: > > what part of "tape device emulation" are you looking for ?? > > "disks" can do some of the work but: > > - tar can talk to tapes or disks for debugging some of the "tape sw" > - disks can do raid1 > > - eject and mt won't work on disks :-) > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDzB2twjCqooJyNAMRAkB0AKC5uskYBFyhcTkU1rgYcsIrxhgJMQCgkAVs 6eCLaJ6eT0WLKhGPTtDW67E= =+Zr2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From jxh at jxh.com Mon Jan 16 14:56:24 2006 From: jxh at jxh.com (Jim Hickstein) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:56:24 -0600 Subject: Linux Tape Device Emulation? In-Reply-To: <27F1A1D5-801E-4B4D-84F2-54E194C3FE2C@halligan.org> References: <27F1A1D5-801E-4B4D-84F2-54E194C3FE2C@halligan.org> Message-ID: <43CC2498.3010104@jxh.com> > Specifically, what I'm looking for, is a method to interface a volume, > or block device, as a tape, so that I can > then have remote devices read/write to that volume as a RMT (remote > magnetic tape) device. I have a mail > system that only supports local tape, RMT or NDMP for backups... NDMP is > way out of my budget right now (lowest cost > software I've found that does ndmp reliably is almost as much as the > mail system cost.. about $20k), and I'd rather > not buy a tape drive right now, if I could avoid it. Sounds familiar. I bought a tape drive, but used, and for cheap. (LTO-1 is at the right point on the price curve, and holds all I need on a single volume -- for now.) RMT also works for me, but use large blocksize writes to keep things moving. If there is any more money (which there might not be), talk to my friend Rex Walters at www.datadomain.com. Their product addresses this, in general. It's a box of disks, but does very good compression based on the assumption of sequential access, and dumps not being entirely novel from one day to the next. From michael at halligan.org Mon Jan 16 16:03:24 2006 From: michael at halligan.org (Michael T. Halligan) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:03:24 -0800 Subject: Linux Tape Device Emulation? In-Reply-To: <43CC2498.3010104@jxh.com> References: <27F1A1D5-801E-4B4D-84F2-54E194C3FE2C@halligan.org> <43CC2498.3010104@jxh.com> Message-ID: <81860DAA-70B9-4A0D-94E5-158F9E85F734@halligan.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim, Oddly enough, we have the same exact solution from what I've heard, the Mirapoint! Small world. I'm always a bit hesitant to purchase used gear, especially when it comes to tapes (given the moving parts). Ideally, I'd just hook an lto-3 onto it, and take advantage of the speed (576gb/hour), which meant if I was at full capacity (100gb) a full backup or restore should be around 20 minutes, which has it's appeal.. and around a $7k pricetag (for which I could build two very redundant file servers as dedicated backup servers, and have enough $$ to take my wife out to dinner at French Laundry). On the other hand.. lto-1 drives have the capacity I need, and a good pricepoint .. around $1k it seems. What do the datadomain boxes look like pricewise? Michael T. Halligan - ------------------------------------- BitPusher, LLC http://www.bitpusher.com/ On Jan 16, 2006, at 2:56 PM, Jim Hickstein wrote: >> Specifically, what I'm looking for, is a method to interface a >> volume, or block device, as a tape, so that I can >> then have remote devices read/write to that volume as a RMT >> (remote magnetic tape) device. I have a mail >> system that only supports local tape, RMT or NDMP for backups... >> NDMP is way out of my budget right now (lowest cost >> software I've found that does ndmp reliably is almost as much as >> the mail system cost.. about $20k), and I'd rather >> not buy a tape drive right now, if I could avoid it. > > Sounds familiar. I bought a tape drive, but used, and for cheap. > (LTO-1 is at the right point on the price curve, and holds all I > need on a single volume -- for now.) RMT also works for me, but > use large blocksize writes to keep things moving. > > If there is any more money (which there might not be), talk to my > friend Rex Walters at www.datadomain.com. Their product addresses > this, in general. It's a box of disks, but does very good > compression based on the assumption of sequential access, and dumps > not being entirely novel from one day to the next. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDzDRPwjCqooJyNAMRApwyAJ9u/iJwPHdUJGh1ULbwYrMwlscQDgCgpDYP AOt0LbMLi2YXL/blPsW0aZM= =au7g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From jxh at jxh.com Mon Jan 16 16:51:43 2006 From: jxh at jxh.com (Jim Hickstein) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:51:43 -0600 Subject: Linux Tape Device Emulation? In-Reply-To: <81860DAA-70B9-4A0D-94E5-158F9E85F734@halligan.org> References: <27F1A1D5-801E-4B4D-84F2-54E194C3FE2C@halligan.org> <43CC2498.3010104@jxh.com> <81860DAA-70B9-4A0D-94E5-158F9E85F734@halligan.org> Message-ID: <43CC3F9F.9050609@jxh.com> > Oddly enough, we have the same exact solution from what I've heard, the > Mirapoint! Small world. :-) Disclosure: I work for Mirapoint. But I run my box in production just like anyone else: www.imap-partners.net. > I'm always a bit hesitant to purchase used gear, especially when it > comes to tapes (given the moving parts). Ideally, > I'd just hook an lto-3 onto it, and take advantage of the speed > (576gb/hour), which meant if I was at full capacity (100gb) > a full backup or restore should be around 20 minutes, which has it's > appeal.. and around a $7k pricetag (for which I > could build two very redundant file servers as dedicated backup servers, > and have enough $$ to take my wife out to > dinner at French Laundry). *ahem* Tape speed isn't the primary constraint. LTO-1s are going for $500 on eBay; I got a couple from a local fellow for less. Buy two (more if you want to clone tapes and still keep a spare). Spend your money on a _new_ cleaning cart and some _new_ tapes. They're at the sweet spot on the price curve, too, lately. But here's something for nothing: Your Mirapoint box will offline the local tape after every operation -- can't be made not to -- and LTO's (unlike DLT-7000, at least) need human intervention to re-load and read again for a restore. (A DLT-7000 just turns off the "operate handle" light and carries on. The LTO you have to stuff back into the slot. Maybe that's not a problem for you. My 80GB M300 won't fit on a DLT-7000 tape any more. It's 35/"70", note quotes.) Via RMT, you can point it at the no-rewind device and otherwise have appropriate control over this. I measured speed writing to a local DLT-7000 from my M300. About 4h for 30GB doing 'backup full tape ""' (the default, and fixed, blocksize). Use RMT with the default blocksize ("") via a private 100Base-T network to a FreeBSD 4.6 box with the same drive on a wide SCSI bus, and you're looking at 24h for the same dump. Crank up the blocksize argument there to 2MB and it's back in the range you expect. (_That_ was a long weekend in the lab.) This is the file-by-file dump, and opening files is expensive, so you won't saturate a tape drive, or even 100Base-T necessarily. I'm happy keeping it streaming. Via NDMP it can do image dumps and get around this, but yes the DMA is in another league. For now. > On the other hand.. lto-1 drives have the capacity I need, and a good > pricepoint .. around $1k it seems. What do the datadomain > boxes look like pricewise? No idea. But I used to work for Rex when he was at Mirapoint (he's the King of the SEs at DataDomain now), and I happen to have chatted with him the other day. Sounds very interesting, but I'm old-school: I like my dumps removable. Bearings die; heads crash. Yes, tape drives have a lot of moving parts and they're objectively less reliable than disk drives. But _a given tape_ isn't so bad. And I can afford to be careful: I test my backups routinely. If it wouldn't wear out my co-lo guys, I'd send two copies offsite every Monday, to two different tectonic plates. From michael at halligan.org Mon Jan 16 21:46:17 2006 From: michael at halligan.org (Michael T. Halligan) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:46:17 -0800 Subject: Linux Tape Device Emulation? In-Reply-To: <43CC3F9F.9050609@jxh.com> References: <27F1A1D5-801E-4B4D-84F2-54E194C3FE2C@halligan.org> <43CC2498.3010104@jxh.com> <81860DAA-70B9-4A0D-94E5-158F9E85F734@halligan.org> <43CC3F9F.9050609@jxh.com> Message-ID: <7E0E8150-68BA-4600-ABF3-7AEE5EC4A455@halligan.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 16, 2006, at 4:51 PM, Jim Hickstein wrote: >> Oddly enough, we have the same exact solution from what I've >> heard, the Mirapoint! Small world. > > :-) Disclosure: I work for Mirapoint. But I run my box in > production just like anyone else: www.imap-partners.net. Both facts were known to me, it's a small world we live in :) > >> I'm always a bit hesitant to purchase used gear, especially when >> it comes to tapes (given the moving parts). Ideally, >> I'd just hook an lto-3 onto it, and take advantage of the speed >> (576gb/hour), which meant if I was at full capacity (100gb) >> a full backup or restore should be around 20 minutes, which has >> it's appeal.. and around a $7k pricetag (for which I >> could build two very redundant file servers as dedicated backup >> servers, and have enough $$ to take my wife out to >> dinner at French Laundry). > > *ahem* Tape speed isn't the primary constraint. LTO-1s are going > for $500 on eBay; I got a couple from a local fellow for less. Buy > two (more if you want to clone tapes and still keep a spare). Spend > your money on a _new_ cleaning cart and some _new_ tapes. They're > at the sweet spot on the price curve, too, lately. The pricing is pretty attractive. I'd like to keep this under $2k for the next 3-4 months (realistically, I don't see us growing by more than about 500MB per month in the foreseeable future). > But here's something for nothing: Your Mirapoint box will offline > the local tape after every operation -- can't be made not to -- and > LTO's (unlike DLT-7000, at least) need human intervention to re- > load and read again for a restore. (A DLT-7000 just turns off the > "operate handle" light and carries on. The LTO you have to stuff > back into the slot. Maybe that's not a problem for you. My 80GB > M300 won't fit on a DLT-7000 tape any more. It's 35/"70", note > quotes.) Via RMT, you can point it at the no-rewind device and > otherwise have appropriate control over this. Annoying, but at least I can get around that by scheduling a tape rotation once or twice daily from the noc staff at my colo provider.. Though, if RMT performs just as well as local tape, then I might as well just attach to my backup server, then. > I measured speed writing to a local DLT-7000 from my M300. About > 4h for 30GB doing 'backup full tape ""' (the default, and fixed, > blocksize). Use RMT with the default blocksize ("") via a private > 100Base-T network to a FreeBSD 4.6 box with the same drive on a > wide SCSI bus, and you're looking at 24h for the same dump. Crank > up the blocksize argument there to 2MB and it's back in the range > you expect. (_That_ was a long weekend in the lab.) > > This is the file-by-file dump, and opening files is expensive, so > you won't saturate a tape drive, or even 100Base-T necessarily. > I'm happy keeping it streaming. Via NDMP it can do image dumps and > get around this, but yes the DMA is in another league. For now. Is the speed on an LTO-1 comparable to the dlt-7000, 4 hours for 30GB worth of data? This seems really slow. We have the M450 so perhaps the speed has improved somewhat? >> On the other hand.. lto-1 drives have the capacity I need, and a >> good pricepoint .. around $1k it seems. What do the datadomain >> boxes look like pricewise? > > No idea. But I used to work for Rex when he was at Mirapoint (he's > the King of the SEs at DataDomain now), and I happen to have > chatted with him the other day. Sounds very interesting, but I'm > old-school: I like my dumps removable. Bearings die; heads crash. > Yes, tape drives have a lot of moving parts and they're objectively > less reliable than disk drives. But _a given tape_ isn't so bad. > And I can afford to be careful: I test my backups routinely. If it > wouldn't wear out my co-lo guys, I'd send two copies offsite every > Monday, to two different tectonic plates. Virtual Tape libraries are appealing. I'm thinking, however, that the price point is bound to be just as prohibitive as a higher end backup solution that supports NDMP like Veritas, or Legato currently is. As is, this is the only device in our infrastructure with any strict need for tapes, so it would be hard to justify. This is one of the places where tape is very disappointing as a backup solution to me. I'd much rather copy the data to a file server, then just copy the deltas (or full images) over the wan to our other datacenters for off- sight every night. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDzIStwjCqooJyNAMRAqXGAKCIaVLOuBMcfU9oIGhdhSVqd3GCZgCgr7zp OikuF0tiFB2yXYr2c6tLC5Q= =6q7b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From jxh at jxh.com Tue Jan 17 07:15:40 2006 From: jxh at jxh.com (Jim Hickstein) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:15:40 -0600 Subject: Linux Tape Device Emulation? In-Reply-To: <7E0E8150-68BA-4600-ABF3-7AEE5EC4A455@halligan.org> References: <27F1A1D5-801E-4B4D-84F2-54E194C3FE2C@halligan.org> <43CC2498.3010104@jxh.com> <81860DAA-70B9-4A0D-94E5-158F9E85F734@halligan.org> <43CC3F9F.9050609@jxh.com> <7E0E8150-68BA-4600-ABF3-7AEE5EC4A455@halligan.org> Message-ID: <43CD0A1C.5050406@jxh.com> > Annoying, but at least I can get around that by scheduling a tape > rotation once or twice daily from the noc staff at my colo provider.. > Though, if RMT performs just as well as local tape, then I might as well > just attach to my backup server, then. RMT with an adequate blocksize is in the same ballpark, but local tape is going to give you the best speed. If you have remote hands who can touch tapes every day, I'd stick with local tape. > Is the speed on an LTO-1 comparable to the dlt-7000, 4 hours for 30GB > worth of data? This seems really slow. We have the M450 so perhaps the > speed has improved somewhat? I think it's probably comparable. I don't have an M450 to try, and didn't have an LTO-1 until recently. It's still expensive to open files, though, so I wouldn't look for a lot more than this. Give it a try. > Virtual Tape libraries are appealing. I'm thinking, however, that the > price point is bound to be just as prohibitive as a higher end backup > solution that supports NDMP like Veritas, or Legato currently is. I also have a physical tape library (28-slot DLT-4000 thing), and after playing with it came to the conclusion that the big bucks you spend on Veritas are mostly about managing such a thing: talking to it, knowing what is on which tape, etc. I have so far avoided needing it, but it's next in line. > rather copy the data to a file server, then just copy the deltas (or > full images) over the wan to our other datacenters for off-sight every > night. The WAN copy angle is where Data Domain looks good, btw, since it compresses first and only copies deltas. If you pay for bandwidth, this can open up some options that aren't otherwise economically feasible. From alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com Tue Jan 17 13:17:29 2006 From: alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com (Alvin Oga) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:17:29 -0800 (PST) Subject: old crts/parts/systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: hi ya - for those that wanted some CRTs ... - i have one more batch of parts/systems/monitors to collect as soon as it's declared "throw away" by the clients, and i'm expecting to haul it away this week to my office - there's also a 1TB Dell powervault that is being tossed to be sold on ebay or ?? to the highest bidders - what i'm hoping to do is to repackage some of these old systems ( p3-1G or slower or faster ) into a custom 1U or 1.5U or 2U rackmount chassis - if the costs of the chassis is covered ... i'm happy and the machines will hopefully have a new home for another few years - i'll know more about the hardware list later c ya alvin From sigje at sigje.org Tue Jan 17 15:18:49 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:18:49 -0800 (PST) Subject: January BayLISA Events - Register now! Message-ID: 2 meetings, 4 great talks this month! Thursday is Enterprise Grade Virtualization with Open Source Technologies, and NetBSD 3.0 for System Administrators at the Apple Campus. Next Thursday is Google Site Reliability and Open Source @ 20 at Google. Details following. PLEASE RSVP. For the Google event, it's especially important as it will make it much easier to get in (you will be pre-signed in rather than having to sign up at the door). January 19, 2005 Location: Garage 1, upstairs room in Building 4 on Apple Campus. 4 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, California 95014 Time: 7:30-9:45pm Enterprise Grade Virtualization with Open Source Technologies RSVP: http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23223462 Virtualization is a new and hot item to the world of Linux and Windows. There have been, however, virtualization technologies for over 40 years, starting with the IBM emulators for mainframes, and later with the CP67 and VM virtualizing operating systems. Open Source operating systems like Linux offer the potential to make virtualization fast, easy and a commodity by introducing the required changes into the OS as part of the standard kernel. Fast virtualization with a low overhead, furthermore makes it possible for the first time to use it in production environments (rather than just test and development). Xen, the leading Open Source virtualization technology has quickly become a standard adopted by many leading ISVs to build comprehensive data center efficiency and management solutions. This presentation will provide an overview of Xen and discuss best practices for deploying it to achieve enterprise grade virtualization. NetBSD 3 for System Administrators: an Overview You may be familiar with NetBSD as an excellent platform for embedded systems development, or as a highly portable OS which supports legacy hardware ranging from the Sun 3 to the Alpha. But did you know that NetBSD is a full-featured, modern OS that also works very well as a general-purpose OS? See what NetBSD 3.0 has to offer from a system administrator's perspective in this brief overview designed to highlight some of NetBSD's distinctive features. Meeting sponsored by XenSource January 26, 2006 - BayLISA Special Event Location: Building 43, Google Campus, Mountain View, CA RSVP: http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23334795 Google Site Reliability Google's reputation for high reliability is achieved through a combination of commodity hardware, resilient software, and elbow grease. We'll discuss some key principles underlying Google's production architecture, and highlight some of the challenges of keeping www.google.com available to its end users. Open Source @20, A New Game with New Players - Bernard Golden, CEO Navica Open Source @ 20: A New Game with New Players Open Source has traditionally been the province of early adopters. Today pragmatic IT organizations are beginning to implement open source solutions. "Open Source @ 20: A New Game with New Players" will discuss the expectations that pragmatists bring to the game, the challenges open source presents to them, and describes the Open Source Maturity Model as a tool to bridge the gap between expectations and challenges. Meeting sponsored by Google. From sigje at sigje.org Thu Jan 19 12:02:30 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:02:30 -0800 (PST) Subject: BayLISA - Tonight! XenSource, Virtualization and NetBSD 3.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Location: 4 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, California, Room Garage 1, on the 2nd floor in building 4. Time: 7:30pm Date: TONIGHT RSVP Requested: http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23223462 Meeting sponsored by XenSource.. come enjoy pizza, and soda! ~7:15 Pizza! 7:30-7:45 Announcements, Job availability 7:45-8:15 NetBSD 3.0 for System Administrators: An Overview - Jeff Rizzo 8:20-9:45 Enterprise Grade Virtualization with Open Source Tecnologies - Sean Perry, Brian Lavender Please be PROMPT! The meeting will start at 7:30pm. From holland at guidancetech.com Thu Jan 19 16:12:01 2006 From: holland at guidancetech.com (Rich Holland) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:12:01 -0500 Subject: Liability Insurance Message-ID: <019401c61d56$24cb6420$6600a8c0@hackintosh> I'm looking for a general liability policy for a potential contract which requires a "waiver of subrogation" and that my client be named as an additional insurred on the policy. The only company I've found so far to write the policy won't provide the waiver or include name my client in the policy, and requires both "general" and "professional" liability together. My understanding is that general liability will cover things like people getting hurt on your property while professional liability is more like E&O - it would cover me blowing up a customer's system and causing them lost revenue, for example. Since there are so many contractors reading Baylisa, I thought I'd ask.. Who do you use for insurance, and do you know of anyone willing to write a simple general liability policy without the E&O or professional bits (which are much more expensive)? My contract only stipulates the former. Thanks! Rich Holland From michael at halligan.org Fri Jan 20 12:32:44 2006 From: michael at halligan.org (Michael T. Halligan) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:32:44 -0800 Subject: Liability Insurance In-Reply-To: <019401c61d56$24cb6420$6600a8c0@hackintosh> References: <019401c61d56$24cb6420$6600a8c0@hackintosh> Message-ID: <0F9FFD68-A621-457E-B03A-EE465F2BFC14@halligan.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rich, I get my e&o, and general liabiity from this guy: Harry Philipps Paulson Insurance Agency Out of Fremont mirapoint mailbox copy 510-490-2545 harry at paulsonins.com Tell him I sent you. Michael T. Halligan On Jan 19, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Rich Holland wrote: > I'm looking for a general liability policy for a potential contract > which > requires a "waiver of subrogation" and that my client be named as an > additional insurred on the policy. The only company I've found so > far to > write the policy won't provide the waiver or include name my client > in the > policy, and requires both "general" and "professional" liability > together. > My understanding is that general liability will cover things like > people > getting hurt on your property while professional liability is more > like E&O > - it would cover me blowing up a customer's system and causing them > lost > revenue, for example. > > Since there are so many contractors reading Baylisa, I thought I'd > ask.. Who > do you use for insurance, and do you know of anyone willing to write a > simple general liability policy without the E&O or professional > bits (which > are much more expensive)? My contract only stipulates the former. > > Thanks! > Rich Holland > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD0UjxwjCqooJyNAMRAgygAKCVEh/qUExEWuV8A0sr0/s3OE7iUgCeOiFf s0GVr6o0oOK6qudTFVJR8E0= =GfEk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From sigje at sigje.org Fri Jan 20 13:43:12 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:43:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: Tools of the Trade Seminars Message-ID: Given a choice of Scripting for Sysadmins (perl and shell), Virtualization (Xen, VMWare, Sun, IBM,..), Network, SANS, NAS, what would you like the next seminar to tackle? This is aiming for an April Saturday event. Due to the popularity of the Security Seminar event, we have added a waiting list so that if there are any cancellations people will be contacted off the waiting list. http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23147234 We will also give those people still on the waiting list first dibs on a future Security Seminar event. Jennifer From michael at halligan.org Sat Jan 21 17:18:16 2006 From: michael at halligan.org (Michael T. Halligan) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:18:16 -0800 Subject: If anybody's interested in buying a truckload of used tech books.. Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 OK, not really a truck load, but I know they'll fill up the trunk of my beetle! I'm trying to conserve space in my office, and reduce my tech books to the bare necessity (What can't I find on Safari's Oreilly? What do I actually use at least once per month). If anybody's interested, I can deliver within SF, or the peninsula on Monday. The list of books, and the posting on craigslist is here: http://www.craigslist.org/sfc/bks/127339900.html Michael T. Halligan - ------------------------------------- BitPusher, LLC http://www.bitpusher.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD0t1cwjCqooJyNAMRArOZAKCukfYGt9RlqNT6g4zoG5ynEkPo5gCaAmUg End6JAWqYwY14dM+C5mUZ7Y= =pfI0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bill at wards.net Mon Jan 23 15:23:54 2006 From: bill at wards.net (Bill Ward) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:23:54 -0800 Subject: PenLUG this Thursday, Jan. 26: DVD Authoring with Linux by Kyle Rankin (new location) In-Reply-To: <3d2fe1780601231448vf838766k5dc6ada437988fb2@mail.gmail.com> References: <3d2fe1780601231448vf838766k5dc6ada437988fb2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <3d2fe1780601231523v74cc0c6ch5a36263bbbca7481@mail.gmail.com> Peninsula Linux Users' Group Meeting Date: Thursday, January 26th, 2006 Time: 7:00 - 9:00 PM Location: OpenCountry, 1301 Shoreway Rd Suite 211, Belmont, CA 94002 NOTE NEW LOCATION!!! OpenCountry has graciously offered to not only host our meetings but provide food as well! See the Driving Directions for details on how to get there: http://www.penlug.org/twiki/bin/view/Home/DrivingDirectionsOpenCountry Agenda: 7:00 - 8:30 PM: Keynote presentation: Kyle Rankin, DVD Authoring with Linux 8:30 - 9:00 PM: Members' Minutes 9:00 PM: Adjourn to IHOP for social & food time Keynote presentation: Kyle Rankin, DVD Authoring with Linux In this talk Kyle will demonstrate live how to create your own DVD with menus from a sample video--all using Open Source software under Linux. Kyle Rankin is a system administrator for Quinstreet, Inc., the current president of the North Bay Linux Users Group, and the author of Knoppix Hacks, Knoppix Pocket Reference, and Linux Multimedia Hacks. Kyle has been using Linux in one form or another since early 1998. In his free time he does pretty much the same thing he does at work--works with Linux. Members' Minutes Members will have an opportunity to take a few minutes to... * Describe their latest Linux discovery * Ask questions and get help from other members * Discuss Linux projects You can just stand up and talk, or give a short demo or presentation. If you need audio/visual support for your Members' Minute, please contact Bill in advance to arrange for your needs. Free Stuff & Discounts We will be having a door prize drawing to give away free stuff at the meeting, which includes autographed copies of Kyle's books, other books, and O'Reilly T-shirts. Plus all PenLUG members can receive a 30% off discount code from O'Reilly! Free books are supplied by O'Reilly, Addison-Wesley/Prentice Hall, and/or Apress (while supplies last). If you win one, please add your book reviews to our LinuxBookReviews page. If your company would like to contribute free or discount stuff to give out at PenLUG meetings, please mail officers at penlug.org to let us know. From sigje at sigje.org Mon Jan 23 16:19:13 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:19:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: This Thursday: January 26, 2006 - BayLISA Special Event! Message-ID: RSVP Required!! http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23334795 Date: January 26, 7:00-10pm Location: Building 43, Google Campus, Mountain View, CA Topic: Open Source @20, Bernard Golden Topic: Google Site Reliability, Jay Sutaria Many thanks to Google for hosting, and providing food to this event! For more information about the presentations, check out the URL for the RSVP http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23334795 Currently we have about 20 openings left for this event. If you don't RSVP, you are going to run into delays when trying to get in. Internet access WILL be available. Jennifer From sigje at sigje.org Tue Jan 24 10:34:29 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:34:29 -0800 (PST) Subject: Discover "E" Program (Jan-25, Feb-1)Volunteer orientations (fwd) Message-ID: For people interested in volunteering and helping guide young people towards the exciting field of system administration :) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:23:02 -0800 From: Elise Engelhardt Reply-To: SVEvents at yahoogroups.com To: SVEvents at yahoogroups.com, scv at swe.org, SWE-GGS at SWE.ORG, SiliconValleyEngineeringCouncilNews at yahoogroups.com, asmescvs at smartgroups.com, asme_sjsu at yahoogroups.com, ASME-SCU at yahoogroups.com Subject: [SVEvents] Discover "E" Program (Jan-25, Feb-1)Volunteer orientations Discover "E" (E for engineering) is a nationwide student outreach program to expose elementary, junior and senior high school students to engineering and cultivate their interest in math, science, and engineering. This outreach program takes place annually in Silicon Valley from the beginning of National Engineers Week until the end of March. The Discover "E" program was initiated in 1990. Thousands of engineers throughout the United States participate in the program every year. The Discover "E" outreach effort in the South Bay area has been coordinated by the Silicon Valley Engineering Council since 1992. Although engineering is second only to teaching in the number of professional practitioners, there is an astounding level of ignorance of what it is that engineers do, even among children of engineers. The engineers participating in the Discover "E" program help to address this deficiency. They serve as role models and illustrate the importance of education in math and science, not only for a career in engineering, but simply as preparation for living in our increasingly complex world. This program welcomes new volunteers to articipate in this outreach effort. Even if you have never done anything like this before, you can take advantage of orientation sessions and be provided with materials to take with you into the classroom. For more information, contact David Levinson at david.levinson at lmco.com or at (650) 424-2658. The Lockheed Martin session is scheduled for Wed, Jan. 25, in the Building 157 cafeteria in Sunnyvale, from 11:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m. You must contact Dave Licata (dave.licata at lmco.com) in advance to ensure that you will be admitted through building security. The IBM session is on February 1, from 2:30-4:00pm The contact is Lynn Guest, lguest at us.ibm.com Her phone number is 408-463-3076 on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday 408-256-3977 on Wednesday and Friday The session being coordinated by SWE is also on Wed, Feb. 1, from 6:30-8:00 pm. It will be held at: NVIDIA Corp. 2800 Scott Blvd. Santa Clara 95050 While the first two sessions will primarily entail the distribution of teacher requests, the SWE session will involve training of volunteers on how to do outreach. As a result, attendance for this is limited and volunteers must contact(lucy_hsu at yahoo.com) in advance to ensure that you will be admitted through building security. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] SVEvents is a free open Silicon Valley Tech events' annoncements list. To subscribe - visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SVEvents/join or send mail to:SVEvents-subscribe at yahoogroups.com SPONSORED LINKS Event registration Silicon valley real estate Corporate events Event management Silicon valley hotel Event planning ________________________________________________________________________________ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS * Visit your group "SVEvents" on the web. * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: SVEvents-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. ________________________________________________________________________________ From sigje at sigje.org Tue Jan 24 10:27:12 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:27:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: Upcoming ACCU event Message-ID: This isn't system administration focused, but I know that many people cross boundaries as to job functions..and so I'm passing this on as it may be of interest. Heard of AJAX? Well if you haven't, and you are interested in what the buzz is about, this will be a good intro to it. When: Wednesday, February 8, 2006 Topic: An introduction to AJAX Speaker: Gregory Murray Time: 7:00pm Where: eBay Town Hall (next to PayPal/eBay) 2161 North First St San Jose, CA 95131 Map: Cost: Free More Info: AJAX is a technique for using JavaScript to communicate asynchronously with a server-side component and dynamically update the source of an HTML page based on the resulting XML/Text response. For those who want to read ahead for the talk, Greg recommends his introductory AJAX article at Gregory Murray is a lead engineer at SUN Microsystems. He is currently the servlet specification lead. Previously he was a member of the BluePrints team during which he was responsible for the web tier recommendations. He has experience with internationalization, web services, J2SE standalone clients, and AJAX based web clients. He is coauthor of Designing Enterprise Applications With the Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition and Designing Web Services With the J2EE 1.4 Platform (Addison-Wesley). Greg is the author of the AJAX FAQ for the Java Developer. His blog is at The ACCU meets monthly. To suggest topics and speakers please email Walter Vannini via walterv at gbbservices.com From steve at luminareconsulting.com Tue Jan 24 10:57:08 2006 From: steve at luminareconsulting.com (steve) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:57:08 -0800 Subject: This Thursday: January 26, 2006 - BayLISA Special Event! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43D67884.8000505@luminareconsulting.com> MollyGuard says the event is at 7:30. Or is it 7? So while i'm bringing up inconsistencies, whoever updates baylisa.org should change the year to 2006 :) Next BayLISA Meeting January 26, 2005 -steve > > RSVP Required!! http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23334795 > Date: January 26, 7:00-10pm > Location: Building 43, Google Campus, Mountain View, CA > > Topic: Open Source @20, Bernard Golden > Topic: Google Site Reliability, Jay Sutaria > > Many thanks to Google for hosting, and providing food to this event! > For more information about the presentations, check out the URL for > the RSVP > http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23334795 > > Currently we have about 20 openings left for this event. If you don't > RSVP, you are going to run into delays when trying to get in. > > Internet access WILL be available. > > Jennifer From sigje at sigje.org Tue Jan 24 11:08:50 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:08:50 -0800 (PST) Subject: This Thursday: January 26, 2006 - BayLISA Special Event! In-Reply-To: <43D67884.8000505@luminareconsulting.com> References: <43D67884.8000505@luminareconsulting.com> Message-ID: > > MollyGuard says the event is at 7:30. Or is it 7? The meeting proper starts at 7:30pm. Google opens the door at 7pm. Except they let me know yesterday that the doors open at 6:45pm so if you want to show up early, grab some food, socialize before the meeting, please do so. The meeting will start on time though at 7:30pm..so be early rather than late :) > > So while i'm bringing up inconsistencies, whoever updates baylisa.org should > change the year to 2006 :) thanks for pointing that out :) I've updated it. Since I'm sending a message about this.. Address: 1600 Amphiteatre Pkwy Mountain View CA 94043 Tell the guards that you are there for the BayLISA event when you go to park. They will direct you to the right building on the campus.. which is Building 43. When you arrive, check in at the lobby in Building 43. You will be directed to the Tunis room after receiving your badge. Everyone who has signed up on mollyguard will have a pre-printed badge. There are a few spaces left. I will be sending directions to the signups individually as well on Thursday for any updates. We actually will not have internet access on Thursday. Only the speakers are being provided with access. (Google clarified to me today). Thanks! I look forward to seeing those of you who can attend on Thursday! It should be a very interesting night. Jennifer From sandy at wambold.com Tue Jan 24 12:11:20 2006 From: sandy at wambold.com (Sandy Wambold) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:11:20 -0800 (PST) Subject: This Thursday: January 26, 2006 - BayLISA Special Event! In-Reply-To: References: <43D67884.8000505@luminareconsulting.com> Message-ID: I won't be able to make it, but since I'm a Google employee, I shouldn't be on the badge list. -sew From sigje at sigje.org Tue Jan 24 17:02:20 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:02:20 -0800 (PST) Subject: BayLISA General Meeting - February 16, 2006 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Please join us for Pizza and Beer (soda or water if you don't drink alcohol :) after the meeting! Pizza and Beer sponsored by Mirapoint. When: February 16, 2006, 7:30-9:45pm Location: Garage 1, Apple Campus, 4 Infinite Loop Cupertino CA 95014 Topic: Info Integrity: Global Policy and Compliance for Secure Messaging Topic: Network/Application Troubleshooting methodology with case studies and a focus on Voice over IP Directions: http://maps.yahoo.com/maps_result?addr=4%20Infinite%20Loop&csz=Cupertino,+CA+9501 4&country=us For complete abstracts, view the RSVP description. RSVP HERE: http://www.mollyguard.com/event/23347834 Please note, there are two RSVP types. Choose the "Meeting Only" if you plan to attend just the meeting. Choose "PIZZA&BEER BASH RSVP" if you are planning on attending the meeting and the p&b bash afterwards. From david at catwhisker.org Wed Jan 25 14:46:58 2006 From: david at catwhisker.org (David Wolfskill) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:46:58 -0800 Subject: Remember MODEMs? Message-ID: <20060125224658.GV94023@bunrab.catwhisker.org> I've been asked for a recommendation for a stand-alone MODEM intended for out-of-band access to a remote terminal server. I'm not expecting it to receive much use, nor does it need to be either fast or fancy. (We're using 9600 bps for the connections through the terminal server.) It does need to sit for long periods of time doing nothing, but spring into action and work reliably when it is called. It's been so long since I've used a dial-up MODEM that I don't even remember for sure what comanies still make them. :-} (I do still have a Telebit WorldBlazer, I think -- but I know Telebit's been gone for a while.) Suggestions for coming "up to speed" on this would be much appreciated! Thanks in advance; I'll summarize. Peace, david (who hasn't checked the MODEM on his year-old laptop) -- David H. Wolfskill david at catwhisker.org Mail filters, like sewers, need to be most restrictive at the point of entry. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. From cyrus.sage at gmail.com Wed Jan 25 16:03:30 2006 From: cyrus.sage at gmail.com (Cyrus Vesuna) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:03:30 -0800 Subject: Storage consultants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, I'm looking for a directory/recommendation of storage consultants in the Bay area, we are looking to setup a NAS/SAN and tape solution and we'd like to get some expertise in this area. Thanks Cyrus From michael at halligan.org Wed Jan 25 17:03:20 2006 From: michael at halligan.org (Michael T. Halligan) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:03:20 -0800 Subject: Remember MODEMs? In-Reply-To: <20060125224658.GV94023@bunrab.catwhisker.org> References: <20060125224658.GV94023@bunrab.catwhisker.org> Message-ID: <81B06471-8BEB-4654-94D0-30AADE388BEC@halligan.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 You should be able to buy a used USR Courier v.everything for $20 on ebay. Michael T. Halligan - ------------------------------------- BitPusher, LLC http://www.bitpusher.com/ On Jan 25, 2006, at 2:46 PM, David Wolfskill wrote: > I've been asked for a recommendation for a stand-alone MODEM intended > for out-of-band access to a remote terminal server. > > I'm not expecting it to receive much use, nor does it need to be > either > fast or fancy. (We're using 9600 bps for the connections through the > terminal server.) > > It does need to sit for long periods of time doing nothing, but spring > into action and work reliably when it is called. > > It's been so long since I've used a dial-up MODEM that I don't even > remember for sure what comanies still make them. :-} (I do still > have > a Telebit WorldBlazer, I think -- but I know Telebit's been gone for a > while.) > > Suggestions for coming "up to speed" on this would be much > appreciated! > > Thanks in advance; I'll summarize. > > Peace, > david (who hasn't checked the MODEM on his year-old laptop) > -- > David H. Wolfskill david at catwhisker.org > Mail filters, like sewers, need to be most restrictive at the point > of entry. > > See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD2B/cwjCqooJyNAMRAnqnAJ0ZTM34/nrCszoeVM6Dp3SBbJFGGwCcDutz nos1w0+jZ0IHlzoSj1GjZ6g= =okTW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From damon at controltier.com Wed Jan 25 17:15:52 2006 From: damon at controltier.com (Damon Edwards) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:15:52 -0800 Subject: Storage consultants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: We've been really happy with Fusion Storm (http://www.fusionstorm.com). Not sure if they are the cheapest, but they are probably among the best. They have deep expertise and are very close to the various vendors. Our rep is Jim Stucky JStucky at FusionStorm.com On Jan 25, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Cyrus Vesuna wrote: > Hi, > I'm looking for a directory/recommendation of storage consultants in > the Bay area, we are looking to setup a NAS/SAN and tape solution and > we'd like to > get some expertise in this area. > > Thanks > Cyrus > From jxh at jxh.com Wed Jan 25 17:22:33 2006 From: jxh at jxh.com (Jim Hickstein) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:22:33 -0600 Subject: Remember MODEMs? In-Reply-To: <81B06471-8BEB-4654-94D0-30AADE388BEC@halligan.org> References: <20060125224658.GV94023@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <81B06471-8BEB-4654-94D0-30AADE388BEC@halligan.org> Message-ID: <43D82459.5090100@jxh.com> Michael T. Halligan wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > You should be able to buy a used USR Courier v.everything for $20 on ebay. Or $5 at WeirdStuff, IIRC. From steve at luminareconsulting.com Thu Jan 26 01:00:24 2006 From: steve at luminareconsulting.com (steve) Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:00:24 -0800 Subject: Storage consultants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43D88FA8.3000808@luminareconsulting.com> I've had a few deployments... Netapp used these guys, and we were pleased. http://kovarus.com/ (no idea what they bill) EMC on the otherhand... used trainees! -steve > We've been really happy with Fusion Storm (http://www.fusionstorm.com). > > Not sure if they are the cheapest, but they are probably among the > best. They have deep expertise and are very close to the various vendors. > > Our rep is Jim Stucky > JStucky at FusionStorm.com > > > > > On Jan 25, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Cyrus Vesuna wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm looking for a directory/recommendation of storage consultants in >> the Bay area, we are looking to setup a NAS/SAN and tape solution and >> we'd like to >> get some expertise in this area. >> >> Thanks >> Cyrus >> > From dannyman at toldme.com Fri Jan 27 09:53:01 2006 From: dannyman at toldme.com (Danny Howard) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:53:01 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats Message-ID: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Hi, I attended the Google presentation yesterday. I don't normally attend BayLISA meetings because, per an earlier e-mail thread, I live in Contra Costa, but Google ... I have a special fondness for Google. Can anyone tell me if the presentation materials from the Google Ops presentation are available online somewhere? I usually work on Fridays, so I had to leave during the third hour of the presentation. I couldn't help but notice that the little "Open Source at 20" warmup presentation, which in my mind should have been a breezy 20 minutes, took and hour. And when I finally surrendered all hope around 10PM, it seemed that the technical presentation had maybe made it about 40% through, if that. It seemed ... well, it seemed that every slide had a 90% overhead of SysAdmins asking, sometimes insightful, and often pointless questions. My favorites were the ones where ... okay, I'm not flaming. But ... I mean, a lot of the questions were "I have an extremely short attention span so I'm going to ask you now a question which you would ordinarily have answered on the next slide were I not interrupting you." My question, is, do BayLISA presentations normally go like this? Or was there something in the Google water? It would seem very sane to "save your questions for the end" ... because, while I found the presentation engaging, I had this growing desire to jump up on the desk and yell at everyone to just shut up for half an hour and let the guy present ... but that would have been overly stereotypical SysAdmin behaviour, which would have defeated the point. And while I would have phrased my suggestion that everyone shut up politely, I didn't want to be the guy-who-never-shows-up-then-proposes-that-BayLISA-change-its-format-halfway-through-the-presentation. Do you guys always drag presentations out for hours on end? Would it have been frowned on if I had raised my hand and asked if maybe the presenter could present? Can someone forward me the presenter's contact info? I'd love to actually see the presentation sometime. :) Thanks, -danny -- http://dannyman.toldme.com/ From extasia at extasia.org Fri Jan 27 10:33:25 2006 From: extasia at extasia.org (David Alban) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:33:25 -0800 Subject: [baylisa] Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: <4c714a9c0601271033n614adf4fve6cc299d2715060@mail.gmail.com> Yes! I'm glad my inside voice didn't make it "outside" last night. Perhaps, for those folks who might perceive this as a limitation on creativity/speech/etc., a compromise, voluntarily self-imposed by willing individuals, might be: everyone limit yourself to one, simple, easy-to-communicate, non-compound question without follow-ups, before the presentation is over, then go nuts. On 1/27/06, Danny Howard wrote: > while I found the presentation > engaging, I had this growing desire to jump up on the desk and yell at > everyone to just shut up for half an hour and let the guy present ... > but that would have been overly stereotypical SysAdmin behaviour, which > would have defeated the point. And while I would have phrased my > suggestion that everyone shut up politely, I didn't want to be the > guy-who-never-shows-up-then-proposes-that-BayLISA-change-its-format-halfway-through-the-presentation. -- Live in a world of your own, but always welcome visitors. From sigje at sigje.org Fri Jan 27 11:34:20 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:34:20 -0800 (PST) Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: Generally it depends on the presenter. We encourage the presenters to be strict with their time. We'd love to have more volunteer nonBoard MCs that could handle piping up and realigning the talks when they get off topic.. Us Board members are a little hesitant to dictate how the meeting goes .. Any volunteers interested? Jennifer From rsr at inorganic.org Fri Jan 27 11:39:36 2006 From: rsr at inorganic.org (Roy S. Rapoport) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:39:36 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: <20060127193936.GA20643@puppy.inorganic.org> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 09:53:01AM -0800, Danny Howard wrote: > It seemed ... well, it seemed that every slide had a 90% overhead of > SysAdmins asking, sometimes insightful, and often pointless questions. > My favorites were the ones where ... okay, I'm not flaming. But ... I > mean, a lot of the questions were "I have an extremely short attention > span so I'm going to ask you now a question which you would ordinarily > have answered on the next slide were I not interrupting you." > > My question, is, do BayLISA presentations normally go like this? Or was I've gone to BayLISA presentations for the last 11 years or so, on and off (mostly off lately). In my experience, and the experience of some of the people I work with, they've suffered from the "I want to sound smart/funny/insightful so I'm going to make a comment in the form of a question RIGHT NOW rather than waiting" syndrome for approximately 11 of these last 11 years. -roy From jxh at jxh.com Fri Jan 27 12:08:02 2006 From: jxh at jxh.com (Jim Hickstein) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:08:02 -0600 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: <43DA7DA2.4020107@jxh.com> > We'd love to have more volunteer nonBoard MCs that could handle piping > up and realigning the talks when they get off topic.. Us Board members > are a little hesitant to dictate how the meeting goes Oh, we're not all hesitant. :-) I've done this before, though I tried to keep it light. It's actually a documented responsibility of the EventCoordinator (in the internal TWiki), but it often goes better when the EC delegates this to a specific moderator (often a volunteer) who is not shy. There are moderators and moderators, just as there are speakers and speakers, to say no more. To answer the original question some more: It varies. Some meetings are quite formal, hands raised and speaking in turn; some are 4-hour-plus animated "discussions", at least some of which turn out to be worthwhile. (My private concern about the time was mostly that we used to run out of video tape. :-) If you're a witness to one of the latter melees, I'd say it's perfectly appropriate to speak up and ask if this is how most people want it to go that evening. The speaker (or the moderator) can then regain control. From sigje at sigje.org Fri Jan 27 12:11:50 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:11:50 -0800 (PST) Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <43DA7DA2.4020107@jxh.com> References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <43DA7DA2.4020107@jxh.com> Message-ID: > To answer the original question some more: It varies. Some meetings are > quite formal, hands raised and speaking in turn; some are 4-hour-plus > animated "discussions", at least some of which turn out to be worthwhile. > (My private concern about the time was mostly that we used to run out of > video tape. :-) If you're a witness to one of the latter melees, I'd say > it's perfectly appropriate to speak up and ask if this is how most people > want it to go that evening. The speaker (or the moderator) can then regain > control. We can handle 6 hours of recording I think .. MC last night was Alan.. his first time at it..He did a reasonable job, but he was also behind the camera as well. I am definitely hesitant. I actually raised my hand to cut off the questions at the end. Again.. I reiterate, we need volunteers who are comfortable piping up :) Jim move on back here. :) Jennifer From jxh at jxh.com Fri Jan 27 12:23:07 2006 From: jxh at jxh.com (Jim Hickstein) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:23:07 -0600 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <43DA7DA2.4020107@jxh.com> Message-ID: <43DA812B.9080905@jxh.com> > Again.. I reiterate, we need volunteers who are comfortable piping up :) > Jim move on back here. :) Buy me a house. :-) http://www.jxh.com/jxh/1740/ (This rest of this may be OT, but since there's a meta-meeting going on, I'll offer it anyway.) Seriously, though: We (local groups generally) need not only people who can moderate meetings, but a system that makes more such people. Technical people generally won't sign up for a class on public speaking, or anything else they dislike that much, but they can follow someone's lead. If you ask for a volunteer emcee, you won't get the ones who are shy. But maybe you can hook them for something else first (come and help set up the video camera!) and then ask if they will broaden their involvement if offered some coaching. (A role-playing session after a BLW meeting?) Same for the very rare skill of beating the bushes for speakers and sponsors. You and Strata can do that; not everyone can. It can be taught, I'm convinced. From bill at wards.net Fri Jan 27 12:30:56 2006 From: bill at wards.net (Bill Ward) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:30:56 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: <3d2fe1780601271230r9ebf97cv313b8bf6f179fbc1@mail.gmail.com> I agree with those who wish for a little less audience participation in the presentations. It can be very disruptive to the speaker's schedule. Holding questions to the end may be a good way to solve the problem. On 1/27/06, Jennifer Davis wrote: > > Generally it depends on the presenter. We encourage the presenters to be > strict with their time. > > We'd love to have more volunteer nonBoard MCs that could handle piping up > and realigning the talks when they get off topic.. Us Board members are > a little hesitant to dictate how the meeting goes .. Any volunteers > interested? > > Jennifer > -- Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://www.soccersiliconvalley.com/ From rick at linuxmafia.com Fri Jan 27 13:08:12 2006 From: rick at linuxmafia.com (Rick Moen) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:08:12 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <3d2fe1780601271230r9ebf97cv313b8bf6f179fbc1@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <3d2fe1780601271230r9ebf97cv313b8bf6f179fbc1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060127210812.GF29069@linuxmafia.com> Quoting Bill Ward (bill at wards.net): > I agree with those who wish for a little less audience participation > in the presentations. It can be very disruptive to the speaker's > schedule. Holding questions to the end may be a good way to solve the > problem. That's my personal preference, too. Some speakers actually don't like that, though, so my favourite approach as meeting coordinator follows: Before the meeting, ask speaker to pick a policy, any of: 1. Hold questions/comments to the end. 2. Raise hand, wait to be recognised by speaker (optionally with help from meeting coordinator). 3. Blurt it right out, man. While introducing speaker, mention speaker's preference. If it's 1 or 2, be prepared to enforce it with gentle cluebatting^Wpersuasion. In any case, watch the clock and redirect or cut off any kibbitzing that's overlong. From deirdre at deirdre.net Fri Jan 27 13:16:51 2006 From: deirdre at deirdre.net (Deirdre Saoirse Moen) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:16:51 -0600 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <20060127210812.GF29069@linuxmafia.com> References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <3d2fe1780601271230r9ebf97cv313b8bf6f179fbc1@mail.gmail.com> <20060127210812.GF29069@linuxmafia.com> Message-ID: On Jan 27, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Rick Moen wrote: > Quoting Bill Ward (bill at wards.net): > >> I agree with those who wish for a little less audience participation >> in the presentations. It can be very disruptive to the speaker's >> schedule. Holding questions to the end may be a good way to solve >> the >> problem. > > That's my personal preference, too. Some speakers actually don't like > that, though, so my favourite approach as meeting coordinator follows: > > Before the meeting, ask speaker to pick a policy, any of: > > 1. Hold questions/comments to the end. > 2. Raise hand, wait to be recognised by speaker (optionally with help > from meeting coordinator). > 3. Blurt it right out, man. How they're doing it in the seminar today: Breaking the talk into sections, then asking if anyone has questions during specific sections. -- _Deirdre http://deirdre.net From bill at wards.net Fri Jan 27 13:23:47 2006 From: bill at wards.net (Bill Ward) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:23:47 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <43DA812B.9080905@jxh.com> References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <43DA7DA2.4020107@jxh.com> <43DA812B.9080905@jxh.com> Message-ID: <3d2fe1780601271323s732f5bd8u1449b10924eedf0a@mail.gmail.com> On 1/27/06, Jim Hickstein wrote: > Seriously, though: We (local groups generally) need not only people who > can moderate meetings, but a system that makes more such people. > Technical people generally won't sign up for a class on public speaking, > or anything else they dislike that much, but they can follow someone's > lead. If you ask for a volunteer emcee, you won't get the ones who are > shy. But maybe you can hook them for something else first (come and > help set up the video camera!) and then ask if they will broaden their > involvement if offered some coaching. (A role-playing session after a > BLW meeting?) > > Same for the very rare skill of beating the bushes for speakers and > sponsors. You and Strata can do that; not everyone can. It can be > taught, I'm convinced. Would there be any interest in starting a Toastmasters club for technical people? I've been involved in Toastmasters for a few years now and have learned a great deal about public speaking and leadership. And it's a lot cheaper than signing up for a class. -- Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://www.soccersiliconvalley.com/ From bill at wards.net Fri Jan 27 13:39:22 2006 From: bill at wards.net (Bill Ward) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:39:22 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <3d2fe1780601271230r9ebf97cv313b8bf6f179fbc1@mail.gmail.com> <20060127210812.GF29069@linuxmafia.com> Message-ID: <3d2fe1780601271339n2ae0b68cucbfff18ddc1dc347@mail.gmail.com> On 1/27/06, Deirdre Saoirse Moen wrote: > On Jan 27, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Rick Moen wrote: > > > Quoting Bill Ward (bill at wards.net): > > > >> I agree with those who wish for a little less audience participation > >> in the presentations. It can be very disruptive to the speaker's > >> schedule. Holding questions to the end may be a good way to solve > >> the > >> problem. > > > > That's my personal preference, too. Some speakers actually don't like > > that, though, so my favourite approach as meeting coordinator follows: > > > > Before the meeting, ask speaker to pick a policy, any of: > > > > 1. Hold questions/comments to the end. > > 2. Raise hand, wait to be recognised by speaker (optionally with help > > from meeting coordinator). > > 3. Blurt it right out, man. > > How they're doing it in the seminar today: > > Breaking the talk into sections, then asking if anyone has questions > during specific sections. That's a good approach for longer presentations. -- Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://www.soccersiliconvalley.com/ From Brent at greatcircle.com Fri Jan 27 14:02:09 2006 From: Brent at greatcircle.com (Brent Chapman) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:02:09 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: At 9:53 AM -0800 1/27/06, Danny Howard wrote: >It seemed ... well, it seemed that every slide had a 90% overhead of >SysAdmins asking, sometimes insightful, and often pointless questions. >My favorites were the ones where ... okay, I'm not flaming. But ... I >mean, a lot of the questions were "I have an extremely short attention >span so I'm going to ask you now a question which you would ordinarily >have answered on the next slide were I not interrupting you." > >My question, is, do BayLISA presentations normally go like this? Or was >there something in the Google water? Speaking as someone who has presented at BayLISA many times: yes, they usually go like that if the speaker doesn't take (and keep) firm control. >It would seem very sane to "save >your questions for the end" ... because, while I found the presentation >engaging, I had this growing desire to jump up on the desk and yell at >everyone to just shut up for half an hour and let the guy present ... No... But the speaker needs to limit the number of questions they take after each slide, forcefully if necessary, and then Move On. I try to draw the line at 3-5 questions, myself, but that's going to vary by speaker and topic. On the other hand, I think it would have been very appropriate (and, indeed, quite welcome by both the speakers and most of the audience) for one of the BayLISA organizers to stand up and make that statement to get things back on track. -Brent -- Brent Chapman -- Great Circle Associates, Inc. Specializing in network infrastructure for Silicon Valley since 1989 For info about us and our services, please see http://www.greatcircle.com/ Great Circle Waypoints Blog: http://www.greatcircle.com/blog From bob at sutterfields.us Fri Jan 27 14:15:16 2006 From: bob at sutterfields.us (Bob Sutterfield) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:15:16 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: <43da9b77.2dd5d3b6.5e3c.ffffaae4@mx.gmail.com> I'm another list lurker / first-time attendee at BayLISA, but this sort of audience is neither new nor unique. The "I need to sound clever NOW" questions are standard fare. A skillful speaker or moderator can see those questions coming from a mile away, especially if they know the crowd. A really skillful speaker can redirect the force of the question to propel him on through his presentation - it's a judo thing. Brent and I had a repeating pool going on our side of the room, betting how many more questions the speaker would endure before he managed to escape from the current slide. Each time either of us stuck our paws in the air, it was to toss the speaker a slow pitch he could hit in the obvious forward direction and get back in motion through his slides. Sometimes it worked... That sort of crowd control and speaker assistance is neither the exclusive province, nor exclusive responsibility, of the host{,ess} or moderator. It can be accomplished through truly artful questioning by anyone in the audience. The best solution is of course self-control by the rest of the crowd :-) -- Bob Sutterfield bob at sutterfields.us http://sutterfields.us From sigje at sigje.org Fri Jan 27 14:35:07 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:35:07 -0800 (PST) Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: So I'm hearing lots of "didn't like" feelings about the presentations last night. Any positives? From ahorn at deorth.org Fri Jan 27 14:39:44 2006 From: ahorn at deorth.org (Alan Horn) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:39:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: > > On the other hand, I think it would have been very appropriate (and, indeed, > quite welcome by both the speakers and most of the audience) for one of the > BayLISA organizers to stand up and make that statement to get things back on > track. > Thats by no means the exclusive domain of the organisers. Any one of you can stick your hand up and say 'hi, theres a lot of questions, but can we see more slides please' :) Cheers, Al From ahorn at deorth.org Fri Jan 27 14:43:11 2006 From: ahorn at deorth.org (Alan Horn) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:43:11 -0800 (PST) Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Jennifer Davis wrote: >Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:35:07 -0800 (PST) >From: Jennifer Davis >To: baylisa at baylisa.org >Subject: Re: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats > > > So I'm hearing lots of "didn't like" feelings about the presentations last > night. Any positives? > > > I thought Bernard's presentation was great. A very different type of presentation subject. Perhaps I'm in the minority, A lot of folks in the room didn't seem to 'get' that one. I wanted more out of the google presentation. There was wayyyy to much "I can't answer that", or "I'm not really the most qualified person..." Perhaps you aren't, but you're in front of us, and so make a stab at it without all the qualifiers. Perhaps Google needs to sit down and work out what their speakers can and can't say ? He seemed too wary to me. That said, the subject matter was nice, albeit nowhere near as technical as I'd desired. The venus was excellent, as was the food. I look forward to the next event there. Cheers, Al From dannyman at toldme.com Fri Jan 27 15:06:24 2006 From: dannyman at toldme.com (Danny Howard) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:06:24 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: <20060127230624.GB9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 02:35:07PM -0800, Jennifer Davis wrote: > > So I'm hearing lots of "didn't like" feelings about the presentations last > night. Any positives? Well, I thought the material being presented was interesting. But I couldn't make it through the Q&A. If I could get in touch with the speaker and/or materials, I would greatly appreciate that. :) Perhaps if he does his presentation again, I can enjoy the content properly. The spread was ... excellent, and the Google campus makes me hot. And since I have friends at Google ... if somehow they were to find themselves donating space for meetings, it would be substantially more tempting to make the trip down for meetings. Heck, I'd even volunteer to emcee and cut off questions when things get out of hand. My 2c. :) -danny From dannyman at toldme.com Fri Jan 27 15:08:49 2006 From: dannyman at toldme.com (Danny Howard) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:08:49 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <43da9b77.2dd5d3b6.5e3c.ffffaae4@mx.gmail.com> References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <43da9b77.2dd5d3b6.5e3c.ffffaae4@mx.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060127230849.GC9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 02:15:16PM -0800, Bob Sutterfield wrote: > Brent and I had a repeating pool going on our side of the room, betting how > many more questions the speaker would endure before he managed to escape > from the current slide. Each time either of us stuck our paws in the air, > it was to toss the speaker a slow pitch he could hit in the obvious forward > direction and get back in motion through his slides. Sometimes it worked... "Hi, I'm just curious what the rest of your presentation is about. What is on the next slide?" I'll remember that next time I'm in that situation again, whether I'd surrounded by SysAdmins or not. :) Thanks for the advice, Bob. -danny From bob at sutterfields.us Fri Jan 27 15:18:23 2006 From: bob at sutterfields.us (Bob Sutterfield) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:18:23 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> Jennifer Davis wrote: > So I'm hearing lots of "didn't like" feelings about the > presentations last night. Any positives? I haven't heard anything negative yet about the content or the presenters (both were fine), only the audience dynamics. -- Bob Sutterfield bob at sutterfields.us http://sutterfields.us From Brent at greatcircle.com Fri Jan 27 15:33:11 2006 From: Brent at greatcircle.com (Brent Chapman) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:33:11 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> References: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> Message-ID: At 3:18 PM -0800 1/27/06, Bob Sutterfield wrote: >Jennifer Davis wrote: >> So I'm hearing lots of "didn't like" feelings about the >> presentations last night. Any positives? > >I haven't heard anything negative yet about the content or the presenters >(both were fine), only the audience dynamics. Yes, that's my feeling as well. The talks were fine, the spread was great, and the venue was good (though having to be escorted in/out through security is always an annoyance), but the audience wasn't well managed (by itself, by the organizers, or by the speakers). -Brent -- Brent Chapman -- Great Circle Associates, Inc. Specializing in network infrastructure for Silicon Valley since 1989 For info about us and our services, please see http://www.greatcircle.com/ Great Circle Waypoints Blog: http://www.greatcircle.com/blog From stripes at tigerlair.com Fri Jan 27 15:36:39 2006 From: stripes at tigerlair.com (stripes) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 18:36:39 -0500 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <20060127230849.GC9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com>; from dannyman@toldme.com on Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:08:49PM -0800 References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <43da9b77.2dd5d3b6.5e3c.ffffaae4@mx.gmail.com> <20060127230849.GC9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: <20060127183639.A18119@tigerlair.com> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:08:49PM -0800, Danny Howard wrote: > "Hi, I'm just curious what the rest of your presentation is about. What > is on the next slide?" > I'll remember that next time I'm in that situation again, whether I'd > surrounded by SysAdmins or not. :) I love it! :) I'm going to have it use it myself :) As someone who has presented at BayLISA without slides, I expected more of a conversation than me just running my yap anyway. The part that surprised me is that there were about 3-4 people who wanted to talk more than me :) -Anne -- Conformity: Proudly (\`--/') _ _______ .-r-. serving painfully boring >.~.\ `` ` `,`,`. ,'_'~`. people since time began. (v_," ; `,-\ ; : ; \/,-~) \ stripes at tigerlair dot com `--'_..),-/ ' ' '_.>-' )`.`.__.') stripes at brickbox dot com ((,((,__..'~~~~~~((,__..' `-..-'fL From ahorn at deorth.org Fri Jan 27 16:03:35 2006 From: ahorn at deorth.org (Alan Horn) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:03:35 -0800 (PST) Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Brent Chapman wrote: > Yes, that's my feeling as well. The talks were fine, the spread was great, > and the venue was good (though having to be escorted in/out through security > is always an annoyance), but the audience wasn't well managed (by itself, by > the organizers, or by the speakers). Thanks for the advice Brent. I'll try and manage it better in the future when I'm EC. I think I'm doing the next Google event as well. That said, I would like to make two comments : The first speaker ran over by 10 minutes. Well within normal 'management' of such, and more timely than a lot of speakers. The second speaker was intentiionally allowed to speak as long as he wanted without interruptions. It's his venue and we wanted to be invited back :). That was a conscious choice decided beforehand. So, poor handling of question flow aside, thats probably the main reason we didn't interrupt. Cheers, Al From jxh at jxh.com Fri Jan 27 16:03:54 2006 From: jxh at jxh.com (Jim Hickstein) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 18:03:54 -0600 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> Message-ID: <43DAB4EA.4030003@jxh.com> > Yes, that's my feeling as well. The talks were fine, the spread was > great, and the venue was good (though having to be escorted in/out > through security is always an annoyance), but the audience wasn't well > managed (by itself, by the organizers, or by the speakers). How about the median BayLISA meeting? Am I hallucinating the bit about raising hands and waiting? From bill at wards.net Fri Jan 27 16:13:03 2006 From: bill at wards.net (Bill Ward) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:13:03 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: <3d2fe1780601271613k25aadd74md2b911948c63c9ad@mail.gmail.com> On 1/27/06, Jennifer Davis wrote: > So I'm hearing lots of "didn't like" feelings about the presentations last > night. Any positives? To be fair, I was not specifically referring to last night in my remarks on this thread, since I was at PenLUG instead. My comments were more general, based on past experience at BayLISA meetings. -- Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://www.soccersiliconvalley.com/ From Brent at greatcircle.com Fri Jan 27 17:02:10 2006 From: Brent at greatcircle.com (Brent Chapman) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:02:10 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> Message-ID: At 4:03 PM -0800 1/27/06, Alan Horn wrote: >On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Brent Chapman wrote: > >>Yes, that's my feeling as well. The talks were fine, the spread >>was great, and the venue was good (though having to be escorted >>in/out through security is always an annoyance), but the audience >>wasn't well managed (by itself, by the organizers, or by the >>speakers). > >Thanks for the advice Brent. I'll try and manage it better in the >future when I'm EC. I think I'm doing the next Google event as well. > >That said, I would like to make two comments : > >The first speaker ran over by 10 minutes. Well within normal >'management' of such, and more timely than a lot of speakers. > >The second speaker was intentiionally allowed to speak as long as he >wanted without interruptions. It's his venue and we wanted to be >invited back :). That was a conscious choice decided beforehand. So, >poor handling of question flow aside, thats probably the main reason >we didn't interrupt. From my point of view, both of them ended up rushing through the last 1/2 to 1/3 of their presentations, which is usually the most interesting parts, because they got held up in the introductory stuff in the beginning. -Brent -- Brent Chapman -- Great Circle Associates, Inc. Specializing in network infrastructure for Silicon Valley since 1989 For info about us and our services, please see http://www.greatcircle.com/ Great Circle Waypoints Blog: http://www.greatcircle.com/blog From Brent at greatcircle.com Fri Jan 27 17:04:59 2006 From: Brent at greatcircle.com (Brent Chapman) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:04:59 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <43DAB4EA.4030003@jxh.com> References: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> <43DAB4EA.4030003@jxh.com> Message-ID: At 6:03 PM -0600 1/27/06, Jim Hickstein wrote: >>Yes, that's my feeling as well. The talks were fine, the spread >>was great, and the venue was good (though having to be escorted >>in/out through security is always an annoyance), but the audience >>wasn't well managed (by itself, by the organizers, or by the >>speakers). > >How about the median BayLISA meeting? Am I hallucinating the bit >about raising hands and waiting? In my experience, it depends on how big the audience is. The bigger the audience, the more likely folks are to raise their hands and wait. With a smaller audience, it gets more informal and interactive, and that's fine with me. I didn't see too many people just blurting things out last night; folks were raising their hands and waiting to be called on. The problem was, the speakers were calling on _everybody_ before moving on to the next slide. Like I said before, I would have suggested taking just a few questions after each slide, and then moving on, even if you don't get to everybody who had their hand up. That way, you don't end up rushing through the ending, which is usually where the meat of the talk is. -Brent -- Brent Chapman -- Great Circle Associates, Inc. Specializing in network infrastructure for Silicon Valley since 1989 For info about us and our services, please see http://www.greatcircle.com/ Great Circle Waypoints Blog: http://www.greatcircle.com/blog From ahorn at deorth.org Fri Jan 27 17:07:02 2006 From: ahorn at deorth.org (Alan Horn) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:07:02 -0800 (PST) Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Brent Chapman wrote: > > From my point of view, both of them ended up rushing through the last 1/2 to > 1/3 of their presentations, which is usually the most interesting parts, > because they got held up in the introductory stuff in the beginning. > > But honestly Brent, thats the speaker's issue to solve. We may have to agree to disagree on this point if you don't see it that way. Cheers, Al From Brent at greatcircle.com Fri Jan 27 17:36:52 2006 From: Brent at greatcircle.com (Brent Chapman) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:36:52 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> Message-ID: At 5:07 PM -0800 1/27/06, Alan Horn wrote: >On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Brent Chapman wrote: > >> >>From my point of view, both of them ended up rushing through the >>last 1/2 to 1/3 of their presentations, which is usually the most >>interesting parts, because they got held up in the introductory >>stuff in the beginning. >> > >But honestly Brent, thats the speaker's issue to solve. We may have >to agree to disagree on this point if you don't see it that way. Yes, it is the speaker's issue to solve, but it is a failing of the organizer if the speaker _isn't_ solving it. The speakers should be briefed before-hand on what sort of audience this is and how to handle them (were they?), and the organizer should be ready and willing to step in during the presentation when things seem to be getting extremely bogged down (as they were last night). Fundamentally, I think that the organizer's job includes preparing the speaker for the audience, and stepping in to try to make sure the talk goes well. The organizer knows their particular audience, while the speaker generally doesn't (though they may have dealt with similar audiences before). Preparing the speaker is part of arranging the talk, and stepping in to nudge things back on track is part of MCing it. Now, on the grand scale of things, this isn't that big a deal. I've been very pleased with the quantity and quality of speakers that BayLISA has been getting lately. This is a suggestion for improving what's already a good thing, that's all. -Brent -- Brent Chapman -- Great Circle Associates, Inc. Specializing in network infrastructure for Silicon Valley since 1989 For info about us and our services, please see http://www.greatcircle.com/ Great Circle Waypoints Blog: http://www.greatcircle.com/blog From damon at controltier.com Fri Jan 27 17:47:03 2006 From: damon at controltier.com (Damon Edwards) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:47:03 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> Message-ID: <0eed07b0df8340615056ac00141f1306@controltier.com> That's a tough order putting room discipline on the shoulders of the speaker. You have to remember that the speakers are invited by the group... therefore, they would probably feel that they are being rude if they go against what the group seems to want. If the group acts like it wants to spend 3/4 of the alloted time discussing the first two slides, the speaker will often let things unfold that way. After all, how well do they really know what a particular audience wants? From my experience, figuring out the scope of what the audience wants to hear is often the most difficult part of any speaking engagement. Isn't it really up to the group to decide what they want from the presentations and inform the speakers of the expectations or format? On Jan 27, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Alan Horn wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Brent Chapman wrote: > >> >> From my point of view, both of them ended up rushing through the last >> 1/2 to 1/3 of their presentations, which is usually the most >> interesting parts, because they got held up in the introductory stuff >> in the beginning. >> >> > > But honestly Brent, thats the speaker's issue to solve. We may have to > agree to disagree on this point if you don't see it that way. > > Cheers, > > Al > From samlb at samlb.ws Fri Jan 27 10:41:11 2006 From: samlb at samlb.ws (Sam'l B.) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:41:11 -0800 Subject: [baylisa] Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <4c714a9c0601271033n614adf4fve6cc299d2715060@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <4c714a9c0601271033n614adf4fve6cc299d2715060@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <43DA6947.9050904@samlb.ws> I also had to bug out at 10 PM, about half-way through the Google presentation -- which I found fascinating. The first presentation had about 5 minutes of interesting information -- which was on the last slide. The remainder of the presentation was a sales pitch, which is lost on techies, who usually do not have actual purchasing authority. We want neat technical hacks, not reasons to spend money. Sam'l B. David Alban wrote: >Yes! I'm glad my inside voice didn't make it "outside" last night. > >Perhaps, for those folks who might perceive this as a limitation on >creativity/speech/etc., a compromise, voluntarily self-imposed by >willing individuals, might be: everyone limit yourself to one, >simple, easy-to-communicate, non-compound question without follow-ups, >before the presentation is over, then go nuts. > >On 1/27/06, Danny Howard wrote: > > >>while I found the presentation >>engaging, I had this growing desire to jump up on the desk and yell at >>everyone to just shut up for half an hour and let the guy present ... >>but that would have been overly stereotypical SysAdmin behaviour, which >>would have defeated the point. And while I would have phrased my >>suggestion that everyone shut up politely, I didn't want to be the >>guy-who-never-shows-up-then-proposes-that-BayLISA-change-its-format-halfway-through-the-presentation. >> >> > >-- >Live in a world of your own, but always welcome visitors. > > > From bill at wards.net Fri Jan 27 21:24:27 2006 From: bill at wards.net (Bill Ward) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 21:24:27 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: <3d2fe1780601272124p2c8a65ddnbec3737ec1173d34@mail.gmail.com> On 1/27/06, Brent Chapman wrote: > Speaking as someone who has presented at BayLISA many times: yes, > they usually go like that if the speaker doesn't take (and keep) firm > control. Not all speakers are assertive enough to do that, unfortunately. -- Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://www.soccersiliconvalley.com/ From dannyman at toldme.com Fri Jan 27 22:17:26 2006 From: dannyman at toldme.com (Danny Howard) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:17:26 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: References: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060128061726.GD9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:36:52PM -0800, Brent Chapman wrote: > At 5:07 PM -0800 1/27/06, Alan Horn wrote: > >On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Brent Chapman wrote: > >> > >>From my point of view, both of them ended up rushing through the > >>last 1/2 to 1/3 of their presentations, which is usually the most > >>interesting parts, because they got held up in the introductory > >>stuff in the beginning. > >> > > > >But honestly Brent, thats the speaker's issue to solve. We may have > >to agree to disagree on this point if you don't see it that way. > > Yes, it is the speaker's issue to solve, but it is a failing of the > organizer if the speaker _isn't_ solving it. The speakers should be > briefed before-hand on what sort of audience this is and how to > handle them (were they?), and the organizer should be ready and > willing to step in during the presentation when things seem to be > getting extremely bogged down (as they were last night). Also, the audience shouldn't suck. Seriously, that's part of my thing with starting this thread ... the guilty parties on here on the list, right? The presenter could have done a better job of wrangling a difficult audience, but even more important, he should have something interesting to say. The MC could have done a better job reading the situation and wrangling, like the presenter, but even more important, they made sure the event happened on time, in venue, videotape, etc. The audience ... let's see. They show up, they snack, they pay their dues ... gee ... and they could maybe try to respect everyone's time so that collectively they gain a reputation as a good audience, who merit the time and attention of presenters and MCs. :) So ... I mean, everyone gets some responsibility, but since we're here on the baylisa list, let's start at home, right? I felt bad for showing up late, and for ducking out early, and for developing a private animosity towards others in the group ... Anyway ... weekend time. -danny From michael at halligan.org Sun Jan 29 01:49:08 2006 From: michael at halligan.org (Michael T. Halligan) Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 01:49:08 -0800 Subject: [baylisa] Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <4c714a9c0601271033n614adf4fve6cc299d2715060@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <4c714a9c0601271033n614adf4fve6cc299d2715060@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This exact sentiment is why I do not go to BayLisa meetings. It's embarassing. The last time I came, I brought 8 friends & colleagues with me, for Brent's speech on Incidient Command for IT. Every 5 seconds somebody was interrupting to ask about ham radio or some other irrelevant tech. Ladies & gentlemen, when somebody is speaking, you shut up, and listen to them. Did your parents ever teach you how to be polite, and not to interrupt? On Jan 27, 2006, at 10:33 AM, David Alban wrote: > Yes! I'm glad my inside voice didn't make it "outside" last night. > > Perhaps, for those folks who might perceive this as a limitation on > creativity/speech/etc., a compromise, voluntarily self-imposed by > willing individuals, might be: everyone limit yourself to one, > simple, easy-to-communicate, non-compound question without follow-ups, > before the presentation is over, then go nuts. > > On 1/27/06, Danny Howard wrote: >> while I found the presentation >> engaging, I had this growing desire to jump up on the desk and >> yell at >> everyone to just shut up for half an hour and let the guy present ... >> but that would have been overly stereotypical SysAdmin behaviour, >> which >> would have defeated the point. And while I would have phrased my >> suggestion that everyone shut up politely, I didn't want to be the >> guy-who-never-shows-up-then-proposes-that-BayLISA-change-its- >> format-halfway-through-the-presentation. > > -- > Live in a world of your own, but always welcome visitors. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD3I+VwjCqooJyNAMRAsfIAKCHVCnm2yTOfcGTCC0JMjnBljn5jgCgrAgx GA6NLi2QcZPBCKRu0EZuvwA= =EPQL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From steve at luminareconsulting.com Sun Jan 29 19:33:44 2006 From: steve at luminareconsulting.com (steve) Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:33:44 -0800 Subject: Google white papers In-Reply-To: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> References: <20060127175301.GX9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Message-ID: <43DD8918.2090902@luminareconsulting.com> These were referenced verbally in the talks. Much more informative... http://www.cs.rochester.edu/sosp2003/papers/p125-ghemawat.pdf SOSP2003 - Sanjay Ghemawat, Howard Gobioff, Shun-Tak Leung 2003 The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine http://www-db.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html Sergey Brin, Lawrence Page -steve From jeff at drinktomi.com Mon Jan 30 10:22:17 2006 From: jeff at drinktomi.com (Jeff With The Big Yellow Suit) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:22:17 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <43da9b77.2dd5d3b6.5e3c.ffffaae4@mx.gmail.com> References: <43da9b77.2dd5d3b6.5e3c.ffffaae4@mx.gmail.com> Message-ID: <8772413951275d5e9d897b42882c2eda@drinktomi.com> I suggest positioning goons on both sides of the proscenium. The goons will be armed with nerf weapons of some sort. At any point the speaker or EC can motion the goons into action. The goons will proceed to bludgeon the source of interruption into submission. After one or two public humiliations the audience will be more respectful. -jeff From rick at linuxmafia.com Mon Jan 30 10:59:57 2006 From: rick at linuxmafia.com (Rick Moen) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:59:57 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <0eed07b0df8340615056ac00141f1306@controltier.com> References: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> <0eed07b0df8340615056ac00141f1306@controltier.com> Message-ID: <20060130185957.GN29069@linuxmafia.com> Quoting Damon Edwards (damon at controltier.com): > That's a tough order putting room discipline on the shoulders of the > speaker. You have to remember that the speakers are invited by the > group... therefore, they would probably feel that they are being rude > if they go against what the group seems to want. Yes. Also, the speaker is usually focussed on his/her presentation, and not watching the clock. This is why it's handy to have someone prepared to lightly step in as needed, in the role of emcee / meeting moderator. > Isn't it really up to the group to decide what they want from the > presentations and inform the speakers of the expectations or format? In my experience, some speakers have strong preferences as to the nature of audience interaction. It seems a small thing to indulge, within time constraints -- though the group can of course suggest a default. From lanning at lanning.cc Mon Jan 30 11:10:23 2006 From: lanning at lanning.cc (Robert Hajime Lanning) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:10:23 -0800 (PST) Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <8772413951275d5e9d897b42882c2eda@drinktomi.com> References: <43da9b77.2dd5d3b6.5e3c.ffffaae4@mx.gmail.com> <8772413951275d5e9d897b42882c2eda@drinktomi.com> Message-ID: <34243.192.168.128.67.1138648223.squirrel@ssl.monsoonwind.com> > I suggest positioning goons on both sides of the proscenium. > The goons will be armed with nerf weapons of some sort. At > any point the speaker or EC can motion the goons into action. > The goons will proceed to bludgeon the source of interruption > into submission. After one or two public humiliations the > audience will be more respectful. I love it! I even have two nerf weapons to donate to the cause! -- And, did Guloka think the Ulus were too ugly to save? -Centauri From sigje at sigje.org Mon Jan 30 11:17:51 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:17:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <8772413951275d5e9d897b42882c2eda@drinktomi.com> References: <43da9b77.2dd5d3b6.5e3c.ffffaae4@mx.gmail.com> <8772413951275d5e9d897b42882c2eda@drinktomi.com> Message-ID: > I suggest positioning goons on both sides of the proscenium. The goons > will be armed with nerf weapons of some sort. At any point the speaker or > EC can motion the goons into action. The goons will proceed to bludgeon > the source of interruption into submission. After one or two public > humiliations the audience will be more respectful. Jeff I expect you to show up at the next meeting and serve in this capacity. Jeff, please do come to the next meeting. The more people we have in the audience that are well behaved that can influence the rest the better. Would an announcement at the beginning of the meeting help? "Please be aware that although your question may be really of interest to you, if it doesn't have anything to do with the topic please hold it til the speaker is taking questions at the end or in the time after the meeting where people can talk to the speaker." Should there be a notice of some sort to the meeting RSVP? or on the website? Jennifer From bill at wards.net Mon Jan 30 11:25:33 2006 From: bill at wards.net (Bill Ward) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:25:33 -0800 Subject: Google Ops Presentation and Meeting Formats In-Reply-To: <20060130185957.GN29069@linuxmafia.com> References: <43daaa42.0a10512a.621a.29d7@mx.gmail.com> <0eed07b0df8340615056ac00141f1306@controltier.com> <20060130185957.GN29069@linuxmafia.com> Message-ID: <3d2fe1780601301125y7db99e81mcf840426f0737edd@mail.gmail.com> On 1/30/06, Rick Moen wrote: > Quoting Damon Edwards (damon at controltier.com): > > > That's a tough order putting room discipline on the shoulders of the > > speaker. You have to remember that the speakers are invited by the > > group... therefore, they would probably feel that they are being rude > > if they go against what the group seems to want. > > Yes. Also, the speaker is usually focussed on his/her presentation, and > not watching the clock. This is why it's handy to have someone prepared > to lightly step in as needed, in the role of emcee / meeting moderator. If you really want to guarantee speakers don't go over, you could have someone in the front row whose job is to watch the clock and signal to the speaker via a small sign or something that they have 15, 5, 0 minutes left. > > Isn't it really up to the group to decide what they want from the > > presentations and inform the speakers of the expectations or format? > > In my experience, some speakers have strong preferences as to the nature > of audience interaction. It seems a small thing to indulge, within time > constraints -- though the group can of course suggest a default. IME, most speakers have no preference or defer to the group's preference, and when they do care, it's usually to hold questions to the end. But you're right that it never hurts to ask. -- Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://www.soccersiliconvalley.com/ From sigje at sigje.org Mon Jan 30 11:26:36 2006 From: sigje at sigje.org (Jennifer Davis) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:26:36 -0800 (PST) Subject: member service & volunteer projects Message-ID: New member service in the works for a shell account, and/or email address. We don't want to use @baylisa.org mailing addresses. We are taking suggestions for possible useful domains. Please send all suggestions to blw at baylisa.org. (do check to see if the domain is available please :) The election committee is reviewing the methods for election currently, examining the problems inherent with our current system. If you are interested in volunteering for this committee contact the chair, Alan Horn ahorn at deorth.org. Jennifer From extasia at extasia.org Tue Jan 31 11:36:16 2006 From: extasia at extasia.org (David Alban) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:36:16 -0800 Subject: Google slides / audio / video Message-ID: <4c714a9c0601311136x1cb4ba97m1579a8c32df42d19@mail.gmail.com> Greetings, Will the slides from the Google SRE presentation will be made available to us? Also, for whom was the recording (video?) made? Thanks, David -- Live in a world of your own, but always welcome visitors. http://extasia.org/resume/ From dannyman at toldme.com Tue Jan 31 12:55:56 2006 From: dannyman at toldme.com (Danny Howard) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:55:56 -0800 Subject: Google slides / audio / video In-Reply-To: <4c714a9c0601311136x1cb4ba97m1579a8c32df42d19@mail.gmail.com> References: <4c714a9c0601311136x1cb4ba97m1579a8c32df42d19@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060131205556.GM9258@ratchet.nebcorp.com> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:36:16AM -0800, David Alban wrote: > Greetings, > > Will the slides from the Google SRE presentation will be made > available to us? Also, for whom was the recording (video?) made? It should eventually be here: http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=baylisa